期刊文献+

循证构建动物实验系统评价制作流程 被引量:12

Systematic development of a standard process for systematic reviews of animal experimental studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,动物实验系统评价已成为整合动物实验结果、改善动物实验质量和指导临床研究的新趋势和重要手段。但已发表的动物实验系统评价在设计和实施过程均存在较多问题。因此,急需一个设计科学、实施规范的系统评价标准流程以提高动物实验系统评价的质量。本文将详细介绍动物实验系统评价制作流程,以推动国内高质量动物实验系统评价的开展。 At present, systematic reviews of animal experimental studies has become a new trend and an important way to synthesize the results of animal experimental studies, improve the conducting and reporting quality of animal experimental studies and provide references for the furture clinical research. However, there are many problems in the design and implementation process of published systematic reviews of animal experimental studies. Therefore, it is important to design a scientific and standard practical process to improve the quality of systematic reviews of animal experimental studies. In this paper, we developed a standard process for systematic reviews of animal experimental studies, in order to improve the quality of systematic reviews of animal experimental studies.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2017年第11期1357-1364,共8页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81303147) 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(编号:lzujbky-2016-67)
关键词 系统评价 META分析 动物实验 Systematic review Meta-analysis Animal study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献71

  • 1陈春英.Pubmed数据库计算机检索医学信息[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2005,18(2):115-117. 被引量:4
  • 2Sibbald WJ. An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management. Crit Care, 2000; 4(Suppl 2): S8-S15.
  • 3Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ, 2001 ; 322: 98-101.
  • 4Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, et al. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ, 2004; 328:514-517.
  • 5Weed DL, Hursting SD. Biologic plausibility in causal inference:current method and practice. Am J Epidemiol, 1998; 147:415-425.
  • 6Weed DL. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related. Int J Epidemiol, 2000; 29:387-390.
  • 7Mignini LE, Latthe PM, Villar J, et al. Mapping the theories of preeclampsia: the role of homocysteine. Obstet Gynecol, 2005; 105:411-425.
  • 8Mignini L, Villar J, Khan KS. Mapping the theories of preeclampsia: Systematic reviews of mechanisms of diseases. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005 in press.
  • 9Carter RE, Woolson RE, et al. Statistical design considerations for pilot studies transitioning therapies from the bench to the bedside. J Transl Med, 2004; 2: 37.
  • 10Roberts I, Kwan I, Evans P, et al. Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation. BMJ, 2002;324: 474-476.

共引文献74

同被引文献109

引证文献12

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部