期刊文献+

L_(4/5)棘突间植入椎间融合器的稳定性及对相邻节段的生物力学特性和生物相容性的影响

The Stability of L_(4/5) Interspinous Interbody Fusion Cage and its Effects on Biomechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Adjacent Segments
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨L_(4/5)棘突间植入椎间融合器的稳定性及对相邻节段的生物力学特性与生物相容性的影响。方法:采集18组新鲜成人冰冻脊柱标本,其中模拟L_(4/5)棘突间植入椎间融合器为研究组,而正常标本为对照组,两组各9例,两组标本进行编号后经棘突间弹性内植入并用固定器进行固定。结果:研究组于各个植入处在前屈、中心压缩、侧屈及后伸下的应变变化均较对照组小(P均<0.05)。于施加最大载荷600N下,研究组椎体的角位移与线性位移在左侧屈、左旋转、前屈、后伸状态下均小于对照组(P均<0.05)。结论:L_(4/5)棘突间植入椎间融合器可有效改善伤椎的活动度,保留其稳定性,有助于减轻椎间盘应力。 Objective: To investigate the effects of stability of the L_(4/5) lumbar,biomechanical properties and biocompatibility of adjacent segments for interspinous fusion cage. Methods: 18 fresh adult frozen spine specimens were collected,including L_(4/5) lumbar for interspinous fusion cage as the study group,and normal specimens as the control group,with 9 specimens in each group. The specimens of two groups were numbered and implanted in vivo and fixed by fixators. Results: The strain changes in different implantation for anteflexion,center compression,lateroflexion and rear protraction in the study group were smaller than in the control group( P all<0.05). Under the maximum load of 600 N,the angular displacement and linear displacement in left lateral flexion,levorotation,anteflexion and rear protraction in the study group were lower than in the control group( P all<0.05). Conclusion: L_(4/5) lumbar for interspinous fusion cage can effectively improve the vertebral activity and keep its stability,which is helpful to shorten the stress of the intervertebral disc.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2017年第11期1776-1779,共4页 Hebei Medicine
基金 莆田学院院内课题 (编号:闽莆院2014042)
关键词 椎间融合器 稳定性 生物力学 生物相容性 Interspinous fusion cage Stability Biomechanics Biocompatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献80

  • 1崔念晖,张益,俞光岩,潘瑾.下颌骨缺损自体游离髂骨移植后骨吸收及其影响因素的临床分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2000,14(3):182-184. 被引量:6
  • 2李强,夏亚一,刘文忠,孙正义.弹性镍钛合金内固定材料表面修饰及其持续动力压应力对骨折愈合的影响[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(5):811-814. 被引量:3
  • 3Müslüman AM,Ylmaz A,Cansever T,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes.J Neurosurg Spine,2011,14:488-496.
  • 4Sansur CA,Reames DL,Smith JS,et al.Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of 10,242 adults with spondylolisthesis.J Neurosurg Spine,2010,13:589-593.
  • 5Mehta VA,McGirt M J,Garcés Ambrossi GL,et al. Transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion:comparison of surgical morbidity.Neurol Res,2011,33:38-42.
  • 6Skowro(n)ki J, Wojnar J, Bielecki M.Interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.Ortop Traumatol Rehabil,2007,9:149-155.
  • 7Cheng L,Nie L,Zhang L.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis:a prospective controlled study in the Han nationality.Int Orthop,2009,33:1043-1047.
  • 8Freeman B J,Licina P,Mehdian SH.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion:5-year results in 60 patients.Eur Spine J,2000,9:42-46.
  • 9Hosono N, Namekata M, Makino T, et al.Perioperative complications of primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion for nonisthmic spondylolisthesis:analysis of risk factors.J Neurosurg Spine,2008,9:403-407.
  • 10Abbushi A,Cabraja M,Thomale UW,et al.The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.Eur Spine J,2009,18:1621-1628.

共引文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部