期刊文献+

腰椎棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex最佳置入位置的生物力学研究 被引量:10

The optimal insertion position of the lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (Coflex) : a biomechanical evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价置入腰椎棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex不同位置后的腰椎即刻生物力学稳定性,确定其最佳置入位置.方法 采用6具新鲜成人尸体腰椎标本(L1~L5),将标本两端固定在生物力学测试系统上.选取L3~4节段为手术节段,L3、L4椎体各置入1枚钢体,附带4个标记点用以记录手术节段运动范围.分别对腰椎标本完整组(保留腰椎韧带及关节突关节)、部分失稳组(切除L3 ~4节段棘间韧带、黄韧带,切开双侧小关节囊,切除L3双侧下关节突50%的内侧骨性结构)、10 mm组(Coflex的U形顶端与硬脊膜之间距离为10 mm)、5 mm组(距离为5 mm)、0 mm组(距离为0 mm)分别加载8N·m的纯力矩进行前屈、后伸、左右侧弯、左右侧旋6个方向的生物力学测试,重复加载3次,于第3次加载时记录手术节段的运动范围.对5组标本在6个方向的手术节段运动范围分别行单个重复因素的重复测量方差分析,两两对比采用LSD检验.结果 5组标本在前屈、后伸、左右侧弯、左右侧旋6个方向的运动范围差异均有统计学意义(F=8.472、18.301、7.700、12.473、16.809、6.624,均P<0.01).10 mm组较完整组在6个方向的运动范围显著增加(t=3.80、3.82、4.49、5.60、4.96、2.98,均P<0.01),较失稳组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).5 mm组和0 mm组在前屈、后伸、左右侧旋4个方向的运动范围较完整组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),较部分失稳组显著减少(5 mm组:t =3.19、6.34、5.26、3.43,均P<0.01;0 mm组:t=4.21、6.68、5.81、3.72,均P<0.01);在左右侧弯2个方向的运动范围较完整组显著增加(5 mm组:t=3.71和5.22,P<0.01;0 mm组:t=3.44和4.95,P<0.01),较部分失稳组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 腰椎棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex的U形顶端与硬脊膜的距离≤5 mm时,其能在前屈、后伸、左右侧旋4个方向将部分失稳标本恢复到完整标本状态,在左右侧弯2个方向不能恢复部分失稳标本的稳定性;≥10 mm时在6个方向均不能恢复部分失稳标本的稳定性. Objective To evaluate the optimal insertion position of the Coflex lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device.Methods Six fresh adult human cadaveric lumbar spine specimens (L1-L5) were mounted in a materials testing machine by embedding to clamps with L1 and Ls vertebrae.L3-4 motion segment of each specimen was operated by selective decompression and Coflex interspinous device insertion.The L3 and L4 vertebrae was inserted one needle attached with four marker points respectively,which were used to record the range of motion (ROM).Each lumbar spine specimen was tested according to the loading sequence at 5 groups:intact (keeping lumbar ligamenta and facet joints intact) group,partial destabilized (resection of L3-4 interspinous ligamenta,ligamentum flavum,facet capsule,and bilateral resection 50% of L3 inferior facets)group,10 mm insertion (distance between apex of U-shaped Coflex and dural sac was 10 mm) group,5 mm insertion (distance was 5 mm) group,and 0 mm insertion (distance was 0 mm) group.Each lumbar spine specimen was tested repeatedly 3 times according to a loading sequence consisting of flexion,extension,left/right lateral bending,left/right axial rotation,loaded with pure moments of 8 N · m,and was recorded the ROM of operative segment at the third time.ROM of 5 groups in 6 directions respectively were analyzed with one-way ANOVA test and multiple comparisons were based on LSD method.Results The means ROM of 5 groups were not all equal in flexion,extension,left/right lateral bending,left/right axial rotation (F =8.472,18.301,7.700,12.473,16.809,6.624 ; all P 〈 0.01).The 10 mm insertion group had significant high ROM in 6 directions than the intact group(t =3.80,3.82,4.49,5.60,4.96,2.98,all P 〈 0.01),but it was no difference comparing with the partial destabilized group (P 〉0.05).The ROM of the 5 mm and 0 mm insertion group were no significant differences comparing with the intact group in flexion,extension,left/right axial rotation (P 〉 0.05),but it were significant differences comparing with the partial destabilized group in the same directions(5 mm insertion group:t =3.19,6.34,5.26,3.43,all P 〈0.01 ;0 mm insertion group:t =4.21,6.68,5.81,3.72,all P 〈 0.01).There were significant differences in the ROM of left/right lateral bending between the 5mm/0mm insertion groups and the intact group(5 mm insertion group:t =3.71 and 5.22,all P 〈 0.01 ; 0 mm insertion group:t =3.44 and 4.95,all P 〈 0.01),but there were no differences comparing with the partial destabilized group in the same directions (P 〉 0.05).Conclusions The insertion of Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization device can maintain the stability of a partially destabilized specimen back to an intact one in flexion,extension and axial rotation when distance between apex of U-shaped Coflex and dural sac was ≤ 5 mm,but can't return the stability in lateral bending.The Coflex can't return the stability of a partially destabilized specimen back to an intact one in 6 directions when distance between apex of U-shaped Coflex and dural sac was ≥ 10 mm.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期179-183,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7112056)
关键词 腰椎 内固定器 假体植入 生物力学 Lumbar vertebrae Internal fixators Prosthesis implantation Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1陈一衡,徐丁,徐华梓,池永龙,王向阳,黄其杉.Coflex棘突间动力内固定装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄[J].中国骨伤,2009,22(12):902-905. 被引量:17
  • 2Villarejo F, Carceller F, de la Riva AG, et al. Experience with Coflex interspinous implant [ J ]. Acta Neurochir Suppl,2011,108 : 171-175.
  • 3Pan H, Chen B, Deng LF. Biomechanical effects of the Coflex implantation on the lumbar spine. A nonlinear finite element analysis [ J ]. Saudi Med J ,2010,31 ( 10 ) : 1130-1136.
  • 4Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15 ( 3 ) : 167-172.
  • 5毛仲轩,江建明,闫慧博,赵卫东,李勇,吴伟平.腰椎单节段棘突间Coflex^TM固定对脊柱三维运动的影响[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2009(3):333-336. 被引量:7
  • 6Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Hely H, et al. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions [ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2011, 131 (7) :917-926.
  • 7Trautwein FT, Lowery GL, Wharton ND, et al. Determination of the in vivo posterior loading environment of the Coflex interlaminar- interspinous implant[ J]. Spine J,2010,10( 3 ) :244-251.
  • 8周盛源,陈雄生,贾连顺,朱巍,房雷,蔡弢艺.棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex预防腰椎融合术后相邻节段退变的短期随访疗效观察[J].中华外科杂志,2012,50(9):772-775. 被引量:11
  • 9Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, et al. Biomeehanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion[ J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech ,2011,78 (5) :404-409.
  • 10Wilke llJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiseal pressure[ J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17 ( 8 ) :1049-1056.

二级参考文献85

  • 1周跃,梅芳瑞,张峡,吴远清.保留脊柱后韧带复合结构多椎板切除术的生物力学研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,1994,11(5):267-267. 被引量:11
  • 2连平,孙荣华,杨维权,王维民,刘大雄,张连生,杨广才,贾连顺,戴力杨,徐印坎,张永涛.腰椎椎管与硬膜囊横截面积及其动态变化的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(3):151-154. 被引量:17
  • 3邱贵兴.正确评价脊柱退变性疾病的非融合治疗技术[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(16):1081-1083. 被引量:11
  • 4Etebar S,Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segnent failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumention for degenerative instability[J].J Neurosurg, 1999, 90(2 suppl) :163-169.
  • 5Minns R J, Walsh WK. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine[J]. Spine, 1999, 22(16): 1819-1825.
  • 6Wilke HJ, Drumm J, H?ussler K, et al.Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure [J].Eur Spine J, 2008,17(8): 1049-1056.
  • 7Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative sPinal stenosis with segmental instability[J].J Korean Med Sci,2007,22(2):330-335.
  • 8Talwar V, Lindsey DP, Frederick AD, et al. Insertion loads of the X-STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication [J]. Eur Spine J, 2006,15 (6): 908-912.
  • 9ShePherd DET, Leahy JC, Mathias K J, et al. Spinous process strength[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(3):319-323.
  • 10McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2- year clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2005,14 (8) :727-737.

共引文献65

同被引文献109

  • 1Videbaek TS,Egund N,Christensen FB,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion:the impact of anterior column support:a randomized clinical trial with an eight-to thirteen-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up[J].Spine,2010,35(22):1955-1964.
  • 2Bastian L,Lange U,Knop C,et al.Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation:a biomechanical study[J].Eur Spine J,2001,10(4):295-300.
  • 3Levin DA,Hale JJ,Bendo JA.Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease[J].Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis,2007,65(1):29-36.
  • 4Hartmann F,Dietz SO,Kuhn S,et al.Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion[J].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2011,78(5):404-409.
  • 5Tsai KJ,Murakami H,Lowery GL,et al.A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine[J].J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15(3):167-172.
  • 6Korovessis P,Repantis T,Zacharatos S,et al.Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion[J]? Eur Spine J,2009,18(6):830-840.
  • 7Ghiselli G,Wang JC,Hsu WK,et al.L5-S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after L4-L5 isolated fusion[J].Spine,2003,28(12):1275-1280.
  • 8Cheh G,Bridwell KH,Lenke LG,et al.Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation:a minimum 5-year follow-up[J].Spine,2007,32(20):2253-2257.
  • 9Schulte TL,Leistra F,Bullmann V,et al.Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2007,16(12):2152-2158.
  • 10Hartmann F,Dietz SO,Hely H,et al.Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2011,131(7):917-926.

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部