期刊文献+

新高考与走班制教学的推进 被引量:16

The New College Entrance Examinations and the Promotion of the Class Selection System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 推进走班制教学是顺应新时代发展和高考新方案要求的一项重要举措。文章在分析了当前试点工作中出现的"因考施教""田忌赛马规则盛行""过早确定职业发展方向""课程设计重类型轻层次"等问题之后,分别从思想观念的转变、国家课程标准的理解、高校招生要求的解析、课程分类分层的设计、专职辅导教师的设立、学生职业兴趣、知识基础和学习潜力的测查,以及选课走班指导系统的建设等方面,对完善走班制教学模式提出了几点具体建议。 Promoting the Class Selection System(CSS)is an important step towards fulfilling the demands of changing times and the national plan for the reform system of the new college entrance examination to be built by 2020.This paper analyzes several issues that have surfaced during the pilot phase so far,namely teaching to the test,cherry picking 'easier'subjects,prematurely finalizing career direction,prioritizing depth over breadth in curriculum design,etc.Several suggestions on how to perfect the CSS are offered after taking into consideration various aspects such as the shifting public mindset towards new college entrance examination,national curriculum requirements,admissions office needs,the design of curriculum with depth and variety,the establishment of career guidance counselors,the assessment of student achievement,aptitude,and career interest,and the creation of a guidance tool to help set up customized CSS for individual entities.
作者 杨志明
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2017年第11期5-11,18,共8页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
关键词 新高考 走班制教学 课程设计 职业兴趣 学习潜力 the new college entrance examination Class Selection System curriculum design occupational interest aptitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1American Educational Research Association, Ameri- can Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Edueation. Standards ibr the educational and psychological testing[M]. Washington, DC: Author, 2014.
  • 2Angoff, W. n. Scales, norms, and equivalent seores [M]. Educational Testing Services, Princeton, N J, 1984.
  • 3Petersen, N. Kolen, M., & Hoover, H; D.Scaling, Norm- ing, and Equating. In R., L. Linn ( Ed. ), Educational measurement ( 3rd ed. ) [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1995.221-262.
  • 4Wechsler, D. The Wechsler intelligence scale for ehil- drcn--fourth edition (WISC -IV ) [M]. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 2003.
  • 5Zaehary, R. A. & Gorsnch, R. I,. Continuous norming: implications for the WAIS-R [J]. JournahffClinieal Psychology, 1985,41 ( 1 ): 86-94.
  • 6Dorans, N.J. Recentering and Realigning the SAT Score Distributions: How and Why [J]. Journal of Educational Measure- ment, 2002,39( 1 ):59-84.
  • 7万玉凤,柴葳,董鲁皖龙.选才,如何不止于冷冰冰的分[N].中国教育报,2015-09-17.
  • 8杨志明.学业水平考试成绩等级化中的风险及其规避办法[J].教育测量与评价(理论版),2015(9):62-64. 被引量:19
  • 9杨志明.高考招生多元评价的区分效度——兼论“拼盘式”和“跨栏式”多元评价方案[J].教育测量与评价,2016(5):4-6. 被引量:9
  • 10杨志明.高中学业水平考试等级设定的若干方法[J].教育测量与评价,2016(10):4-9. 被引量:9

同被引文献96

引证文献16

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部