期刊文献+

本末论与王弼的哲学贡献 被引量:1

The Root-Branch Theory and Wang Bi's Philosophical Contribution
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 秦汉时期流行三本论,并由此产生混乱。王弼首次提出一种单一本源论即本末论,认为自然之性是本,而仁义等名教是末。仁义名教产生于自然之性。王弼主张崇本举末,即不仅重视自然之性,而且肯定后来的仁义名教。为了突出自然之性的本源地位,对名言、名教等文化保持批判的做法是必要的。圣人有情说体现了王弼对作为末的情的肯定。 Confronting the confusion of the three-root theory that prevailed in the Han dynasty, Wang Bi put forward a single-root theory—the root-branch theory. He believed that self-so nature is the root, and the teaching of names, such as benevolence and righteousness, derives from self-so nature and should be taken as branches. Wang Bi advocated 'venerating the root to uphold the branches.' That is, human should not only value their self-so nature but also acknowledge the teaching of names. It is necessary to maintain a critical attitude toward the teaching of names to highlight the fundamental status of self-so nature. Wang Bi's one-root theory led people's understanding of entities toward ultimate being, though his philosophy was empirical, not speculative.
出处 《孔学堂》 2017年第3期55-66,共12页 Confucian Academy
关键词 王弼 本源 自然 名教 Wang Bi root branches self-so teaching of names
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1林采佑.略谈王弼体用范畴之原义──“有体无用”之“用体论”[J].哲学研究,1996(11):30-36. 被引量:15
  • 2沈顺福.道与言——论存在与表达[J].哲学研究,2005(1):39-45. 被引量:5
  • 3王弼.王弼集[M].楼宇烈,校释.北京:中华书局,1980.
  • 4李颞.二曲集[M].北京:中华书局,1996.
  • 5黄宗羲.宋元学案[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 6.王阳明全集(上)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.74,16,70.
  • 7Gadamer. Wahrheit und Methode[ M ]. J. C. B. Mohr( Paul Siebeck) Tubingen, 1975.70,463,337,339,341.
  • 8Wittgenstein. Logisch - Philosophische Abhandlung[ A ].载于Tractatus Logico - Philosophicus [ C ].北京:中国社会科学出版社.1999.
  • 9Aristotle. Metaphysics [ M ].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
  • 10Kant. Critique of Pure Reason[ M ].第二版序言,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.27.

共引文献13

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部