摘要
我国刑法中的交通肇事罪的场域为公路与水路,这是刑法理论的共识。然而,由于2000年的司法解释完全以道路机动车辆肇事为对象进行解释,使得"人员失踪"这一水路交通肇事的特有后果如何认定在司法实践适用中面临诸多难题,关于"下落不明"的唯一司法解释也因为自身的理论缺陷而难以充分担当正义。破解现实困局需要从共同过失理论和竞合过失理论角度去论证该罪的违法性和责任构造,而证据法中的事实推论理论和似真推理理论对具体论证"人员失踪"这一水路交通肇事案中特有的损害后果的定罪理由具有非常优越的理论因子。
it is a common view that the objective elements of traffic crime include roadway and waterway in Chinese criminal law.However,the contents in judicial explanation(2000)are only about traffic crime on road,as a result,there are mass difficulties in putting the section 133 into effect.Another judicial explanation(1992)is also not able to put forward reasonable approaches to deal with the complexity because of its own theoretical defect.To solute this dilemma,the article suggests that we should take the theories of joint negligence and coincidence negligence into account in demonstrating the illegality and liability of the traffic crimes.Meanwhile,the reference theory and plausible reasoning in evidence law have an advantage in proving one guilty or not,while we consider‘the whereabouts of victims at present is a mystery'——unique consequence of damage resulted from the traffic crimes on waterway.
出处
《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第5期44-51,60,共9页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
船舶肇事
人员失踪
刑事推论
似真推理
ship traffic accident
missing persons
Criminal reasoning
plausible reasoning
