期刊文献+

“杰文斯悖论”:资本逻辑宰制下技术的生态幻象 被引量:14

“Jevons Paradox”: Ecological Illusion of Technology under Capital Logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 面对日益超越意识形态的全球性生态危机,浸淫在资本逻辑乐园里的西方正统经济学家,仍然坚信构筑在资本机制之上的"技术方案"能够带领人类走出生态窘境。但是,新古典经济学中意蕴为"技术进步并非减少而是增加资源消费量"的"杰文斯悖论",却深刻揭示了资本逻辑宰制下技术的生态幻象,直接戳穿技术万能论者的生态谎言。为了走出悖论,有必要叩访恩格斯《自然辩证法》中深邃的生态洞见,以期在制度正义建构中引领技术与资本的良性互动,渐次开启人类命运共同体意义上的生态治理之路。 : In face of a global ecological crisis beyond the ideology increasingly, western orthodox economists immersed in the capital logic paradise still believe "technological solutions" built on the capital mechanism could lead mankind out of ecological dilemma. However, "Jevons Paradox" in the neoclassical economics implied as "technological progress is not diminishing but increasing the consumption of resources", profoundly reveals the ecological illusion of technology under capital logic domination, which directly exposes the ecological lies of technological omnipotent. In order to get out of "Jevous Paradox", it is necessary to inquire into the deep ecological insights in Engels'Dialectics of Nature, with the hope of guiding the benign interaction between technology and capital in the constrnction of institutional justice, and gradually opening up ecological governance in sense of a community of common destiny for all mankind.
作者 刘顺
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第9期33-38,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目"全球化时代生态正义的意识形态陷阱与破解进路研究"(17YJC710051) 2016上海海事大学学术创新团队项目"新技术条件下马克思劳动价值论创新研究"
关键词 杰文斯悖论 资本逻辑 技术 生态危机 制度正义 Jevons Paradox capital logic technology ecological crisis institutional justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1尚东涛.技术的资本依赖——“物的依赖”社会的技术存在[J].科学技术与辩证法,2007,24(2):54-57. 被引量:2
  • 2周勇,林源源.技术进步对能源消费回报效应的估算[J].经济学家,2007(2):45-52. 被引量:112
  • 3Arrow, K. J. , 1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", Review of Economic Studies, 29(3) , pp. 155-173.
  • 4Binswanger, M. , 2001, " Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What about the Rebound Effect?", Ecological Economics, 36 ( 1), pp. 119-132. B.
  • 5rannlund, R. , T. Ghalwash, and J. Nordstom, 2007, "Increased Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect : Effects on Consumption and Emissions" ,Energy Economics, 29( 1 ) , pp. 1-17.
  • 6Berkhout,P. H. G., J. C. Muskens, and J. W. Velthuijsen, 2000, "Defining the Rebound Effect", Energy Policy, 28(6-7).
  • 7Fouquet, R. , and P. Pearson, 2006, " Seven Centuries of Energy Services: The Price and Use of Light in the United Kingdom(1300-1700) ", Energy Journal, 27( 1 ) , pp. 139-177.
  • 8Frondel, M. , J. Peters, and G. Vance, 2008, " ldentitying the Rebound: Evidence lrom a German Household Panel" ,Energy Journal, 29(4), pp. 154-163.
  • 9Freire~Gonz(flez, J. , 2010, "Empirical Evidence of Direct Rebound Effect in Catalonia", Energy Policy, 38 (5) , pp. 2309-2314.
  • 10Greening, L. A. , D. L. Greene, and C. Difiglio, 2000, " Energy Efficiency and Consumption-the Rebound Effect-a Survey", Energy Policy, 28 (6-7), pp. 389-401.

共引文献172

同被引文献166

引证文献14

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部