期刊文献+

点扩散技术对FDG PET图像质量和SUV的影响 被引量:6

Impact of point spread function on image quality and SUV in FDG PET imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨基于点扩散技术(PSF)的迭代重建方法(True X)对^18F-FDG图像质量和SUV的影响, 并与其他重建方法比较.方法 回顾性分析37例肿瘤患者[男23例,女14例,年龄(63.38±15.25)岁]共79个高代谢病灶.采用包括FBP、FBP+TOF、迭代法、迭代法+TOF、True X及True X+TOF 6种重建方法对PET图像进行重建,进行配对t检验统计学分析.结果 6种重建方法所得的病灶SUVmax均存在明显差异.引入PSF技术的True X重建方法能将病灶SUVmax提高15%~16%.同时,PSF还能明显降低肝部SUV的离散度.结论 不同重建算法所得的SUV,尤其是病灶SUVmax间存在差异;PSF能提高图像质量,但会使病灶SUVmax明显增加,应加以重视. Objective To discuss the impact of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (True X) implemented with point spread function (PSF) on image quality and SUV in ^18F-FDG PET, and compare with other reconstruction algorithms.Methods A total of 79 hypermetabolic lesions from 37 cancer patients (23 males, 14 females, age (63.38±15.25) years) were retrospectively studied.The PET images were reconstructed using the following six reconstruction algorithms, including FBP, FBP+TOF, iteration, iteration+TOF, True X, True X+TOF.Paired t test was used for statistical analysis.Results All six reconstruction algorithms showed significant difference in lesion SUVmax.The adoption of PSF increased SUVmax by 15%-16%, and decreased the dispersion of SUV in the liver parenchyma remarkably.Conclusions Lesion SUVmax calculated from different reconstruction algorithms has significant differences.Caution should be taken in using PSF, as it can improve image quality but may also increase lesion SUVmax.
出处 《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》 北大核心 2017年第8期475-477,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
基金 国家自然科学基金(81301251)
关键词 正电子发射断层显像术 图像处理 计算机辅助 点扩散函数 脱氧葡萄糖 Positron-emission tomography Image processing computed-assisted Point spread function Deoxyglucose
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Wong WIt, Mullani NA, Philippe EA, et al. Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET. J Nucl Med, 1983, 24: 52-60.
  • 2Lecomte R. Novel detector technology for clinical PET. Eur J Nucl Med MoI Imaging, 2009, 36 Suppl 1 : $69-85.
  • 3Surti S, Karp JS. Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-flight PET. Phys Med Biol, 2009, 54: 373-384.
  • 4Holmes TJ, Snyder DL, Ficke DC. The effect of accidental coinci- dences in time-of-flight positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1984, 3 : 68-79.
  • 5Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, et al.Performance of Philips Gemi- ni TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of- flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med, 2007, 48: 471-480.
  • 6Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, et al. Benefit of time- of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results. J Nucl Med, 2008, 49 : 462-470.
  • 7Ronda CR. Luminescence: from theory to applications. Aachen: Wiley-VCH, 2008: 115-119.
  • 8Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long M J, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51 : 237-245.
  • 9Murray I, Kalemis A, Glennon J, et al. Time-of-flight PET/CT u- sing low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010, 37: 1643-1653.
  • 10Mullani NA. Additional gains with time-of-flight PET at high count- ing rates: lessons learned from early time-of-flight PET systems. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51 : 1491-1493.

共引文献24

同被引文献39

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部