摘要
随美国转基因标识法案通过,实质等同作为转基因作物评价准则已被基本否定。该原则存在实验不足、忽视过程、线性逻辑、缺乏历时等方面的科学方法缺陷。同时,它还蕴涵技术红利价值偏好的非科学缺陷。这会造成人体健康生态环境与市场接受度等安全层面,或基于科学假设、或基于利益推测的不确定性结果。基于此,应从科学风险举证性、评价操作合理性及利害取舍正当性层面来建构转基因作物评价原则体系。
Recently, the bill that label of the genetically modified （GM） crops got through in the United States. It means that it is inaccurate that if we still use the substantial equivalence principle to evaluate principle of GM crops＇ safety. We find that the experiment in substantial equivalence principle can not reflect all the nature of GMcrops, because some non - scientific factors exist in the principle. It will cause some uncertainties. So, we should con- struct the feasible principle system on evaluating the safety of genetically modified crops.
作者
徐治立
刘柳
XU Zhi - li LIU Liu(School of Humanity and Social Science, Bei Hang University＇, Beijing 100191 ,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第8期56-60,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
北京市软科学项目(Z151100002615031)
关键词
转基因作物
实质等同
评价原则缺陷
不确定性
评价原则构建
GM crops
substantial equivalence
defect of evaluating principle
uncertainty
equivalence principle
