摘要
目的探讨采取中药熏洗联合NB-UVB治疗特应性皮炎的临床疗效。方法选取2014年1月—2016年10月在我院皮肤科病房住院治疗的特应性皮炎患者共40例,按治疗方法将患者随机分成中药熏洗组及中药熏洗联合NB-UVB治疗组各20例。经过2周的治疗,比较2组患者治疗前后的SCORAD和VAS积分,并比较2组患者的治疗有效率以及患者的不良反应。结果经过2周的系统治疗后,中药熏洗联合NB-UVB组及中药熏洗组症状积分均较治疗前有明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),中药熏洗联合NB-UVB组症状积分明显低于中药熏洗组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);中药熏洗联合NBUVB组治疗有效率为85%,中药熏洗组治疗有效率为65%,中药熏洗联合N B-UVB组治疗有效率明显高于中药熏洗组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);中药熏洗联合NB-UVB治疗特应性皮炎不会增加患者的不良反应。结论中药熏洗联合NBUVB治疗特应性皮炎与单用中药熏洗法进行比较具有更好的疗效,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of herbal fumigation and wash combined NB-UVB in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Methods 40 cases of patients from Month 2014 to October 2016 in our hospital dermatology ward hospitalized with atopic dermatitis were divided into teo groups according to the treatment method. Each group had 20 cases. One group used treatment of herbal fumigation and wash combined with NB-UVB, and the other groups received treatment of herbal fumigation and wash only. We observed the effects after 2 weeks. The SCORAD and VAS score, effective rate and adverse events were statistically analyzed for both groups. Results After 2 weeks of systemic treatment, the symptom scores in group A and group B were significantly lower than those before treatment, and there was significant difference （P〈0.05） . On the respect of total effective rate, the combined treatment group （85%） was higher than the other group （65%） , and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05） . There was no statistical significant difference between these two groups on the respect of the incidence of adverse events. Conclusion The herbal fumigation and wash combined NB-UVB had better therapeutic effects in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, and is worthy of popularization and application in clinical medicine.
出处
《中国中医药现代远程教育》
2017年第13期140-143,共4页
Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
基金
国家自然科学青年基金项目【No.81403395
2014KT1576】
