期刊文献+

经肱动脉急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗40例临床观察 被引量:3

The clinical observation of the percutaneous coronary intervention via brachial artery in 40 cases
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经肱动脉急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:收集2009年3月至2013年9月行急诊PCI治疗病人为研究对象,根据穿刺路径分为肱动脉组40例、桡动脉组80例和股动脉组85例,比较3组穿刺成功率、穿刺时间、复杂病变手术成功率、手术并发症及预后等情况。结果:肱动脉组穿刺时间及手术时间均少于桡动脉组(P<0.01),而3组间穿刺成功率、复杂病变手术成功率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01和P<0.05)。肱动脉组住院时间少于股动脉组(P<0.01),手术并发症少于股动脉组(P<0.05)。3组病人的预后情况差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经肱动脉行急诊PCI治疗是一种安全有效的手术途径,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective:To explore the safety and validity of the percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via brachial artery.Methods:The PCI patients from March 2009 to September 2013 were divided into the brachial artery group(40 cases),radial artery group(80 cases) and femoral artery group(85 cases) according to the operation path.The success rate and time of puncture,success rate of complex lesion operation,surgical complication and prognosis between three groups were compared.Results:The puncture time and operation time in brachial artery group were less than those in radial artery group(P〈0.01),the success rates of the puncture and complex lesion operation in the three groups have statistical significance(P〈0.01 and P〈0.05).The hospitalization time in brachial artery group was less than that in femoral artery group(P〈0.01),and the surgical complication in brachial artery group was less than that in femoral artery group(P〈0.05).The differences of the prognosis between three groups were not statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusions:The PCI via brachial artery is a safe and effective operation approach,which has great value in clinical application.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第4期477-480,共4页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 心肌梗死 肱动脉 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 myocardial infarction brachial artery percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

共引文献33

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部