期刊文献+

公平偏好对供应链碳减排与定价决策的影响研究 被引量:2

The Influence of Fairness Preference on Carbon Emission Reduction and Price Decision Making in Supply Chain
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑供应链各主体的公平偏好特征,用Nash讨价还价解作为判断公平的参考标准,构建Stackelberg博弈模型,求解得到了碳减排量、批发价格和零售价格等最优决策,分析了公平偏好对供应链碳减排与定价决策的影响。研究表明:公平偏好会降低批发价格和零售价格,但供应商公平偏好的影响非常小且不单调;公平偏好会减少供应链碳减排量,而且零售商和供应商的公平偏好对供应链碳减排量的降低都非常显著。 By considering the fairness preference of every members in supply chain,this paper developed a Stackelberg game model to gain the decisions of the carbon emission reduction,the whole sale price and retail price by introducing the Nash bargaining solution as the reference point of fairness,and the influence of fairness preference on the decisions is analyzed. It is found that the fairness preference can reduce the whole sale price and the retail price,where the effect of the supplier is very weak and not monotonous. However,the fairness preference also may reduce the quantity of carbon emission reduction,where the effect of both the retailer and the supplier is significant.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》 CAS 2017年第2期217-220,226,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(16CGL017)
关键词 公平偏好 供应链 碳减排 定价 fairness preference supply chain carbon emission reduction pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献98

  • 1Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114 (3) : 817 -868.
  • 2Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics [ J]. American Economic Review, 1993, 83 (5): 1281 - 1302.
  • 3Kumar N. The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1996, 74(6) : 92 - 106.
  • 4Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions [ J]. Journal of Business, 1986, 59 (4): S251 - S248.
  • 5Hopp W J. Fifty years of management science[ J ]. Management Science, 2004, 50 (1) : 1 -7.
  • 6Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, Thaler R. Fairness, competition on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market [ J ]. American Economics Review, 1986, 76(4): 728-741.
  • 7Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[ J ]. Management Science, 2007, 53 (8) : 1303 - 1314.
  • 8Pavlov V, Katok E. Fairness and coordination failures in supply chain contracts[ EB/OL-. PSU working paper, 2009. http ://www. personal, psu. edu/exkl06/fair_post, pdf.
  • 9Loch C H, Wu Y Z. Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54( 11 ) : 1835 - 1849.
  • 10Ho T H, Zhang J J. Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers : Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54 (4) : 686 - 700.

共引文献301

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部