期刊文献+

个性化全瓷基台联合全瓷冠修复在前牙种植修复中的效果 被引量:6

Effect of combination of personalized all-ceramic abutment and all-ce-ramic crown restoration in anterior dental implant restoration
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨个性化全瓷基台联合全瓷冠齿修复在前牙区种植修复的美学效果。方法收集本院2014年1月~2016年1月的72例前牙缺失患者(共植入80枚种植体)作为研究对象,由患者知情同意后自主选择,分为观察组(37例,40枚)和对照组(35例,40枚)。观察组采用个性化全瓷基台+全瓷冠修复,对照组采用个性化金属钛基台+全瓷冠修复。比较两组术后1周、3个月、6个月的牙龈指数、菌斑指数和红色复合美学评分。结果观察组术后3、6个月的牙龈指数和菌斑指数显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后3、6个月的满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在口腔修复中,与钛基台相比,个性化全瓷基台的临床效果更为显著,更加适合患者选择。 Objective To explore the esthetic effect of combination of personalized all-ceramic abutment and all-ceramic crowns restoration in the anterior dental implant restoration.Methods Altogether 72 cases of patients with anterior teeth loss(a total of 80 implants were placed) who were treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were involved as the object of this research and divided into the observation group(37 cases,40 pieces) and the control group(35 cases,40 pieces) according to their selection after informed consent.The observation group was given combination of personalized all-ceramic abutment and all-ceramic crowns restoration,the control group was given personalized titanium abutment conbined with all-ceramic crowns restoration.The gingival index,plaque index and pink esthetic score(PES)at postoperative 1 week,3 months and 6 months of the two groups were compared.Results The gingival index and plaque index of the observation group at 3 and 6 months after operation was higher than that of the control group,with significant difference(P〈0.05).The satisfaction degree of the observation group at 3 and 6 months after operation was higher than that of the control group,with significant difference(P〈0.05).Conclusion In contrast with the titanium abutment,the personalized all-ceramic abutment achieves more significant clinical effect in dental restoration,which is more suitable for patients.
作者 李瑞 李芃 LI Rui LI Peng(Department of Stomatology,Hulyang White Swan Stomatology Hospital of Huizhou City in Guangdong Province,Huizhou 516211,China)
出处 《中国当代医药》 2017年第5期82-84,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 全瓷基台 前牙修复 口腔美容 All-ceramic abutment Anterior dental restoration Dental cosmetology
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献66

  • 1张凯宇,谭包生,刘晓勇.早期加载对单个种植体愈合影响的实验研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2005,6(1):43-45. 被引量:6
  • 2周琳,刘清辉,秦楚林.义齿修复体基台高度与形状对固位螺丝稳定性的影响[J].右江民族医学院学报,2006,28(3):442-443. 被引量:2
  • 3李智勇,牛薇,方伟,胡建,王贻宁.瓷基台和钛基台用于种植体支持全瓷单冠修复的临床观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2007,42(7):391-394. 被引量:17
  • 4Kim S, Kim HI, Brewer JD,et al. Comparison of fracture resistance ofpressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/ CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments [ J ] J Prosthet Dent,2009,101 (4) :226 - 230.
  • 5Andersson B,Glauser R,Maglione M,et al.Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs:a prospective5-year multicenter study[J].Int Prosthodont,2003,16(6):640-646.
  • 6Tan P L,Dunne J T.An esthetic comparison of ametal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an all-ceramic crown and zirconia abutment:a clinical report[J].J Prosthet Dent,2004,156(91):215218.
  • 7Gordon J. Christensen. Selecting the best abutment for a single im-plant [J]. J AD A,2008,139(5):484 -487.
  • 8Nimet DA, Stephen CB, Lyndon FC. Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments[ J]. J Prosthod,2009,18(1) :17 -22.
  • 9Frank PN,Sabine M,Peter RP. Fracture behaviour of implant-im-plant and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prosthesesutilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments [ J]. Clin Oral In-vest 2011,15(1):89 -97.
  • 10CarolaKolbeck,Michael B,Martin R, et al. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial den-tures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments [ J ].Clin. Oral Impl ,2008 ,19( 10) : 1049 - 1053.

共引文献75

同被引文献24

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部