期刊文献+

不同修复手术在上颌前牙缺失修复中的效果比较 被引量:7

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEM IN EVALUATION OF IMPLANT IN BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNOLOGY
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同修复手术在前牙缺失修复中的效果,为临床提供治疗依据。方法:上颌前牙缺失患者72例,随机分成A、B、C三组,其中A组采用骨增量技术中的种植方法进行修复手术,B组采用隐形义齿的方法进行修复手术,C组则采用烤瓷冠桥技术进行前牙缺失修复手术,观察所有患者的愈合情况,并对比植体植入上颌后3-6个月的二次修复前以及修复后9个月的情况进行X片检查,观察植体和周围的组织的愈合情况。结果:A组种植体和周围骨组织愈合良好的有22例,愈合优良率91.67%;B组愈合良好的有14例,愈合优良率58.33%;c组愈合良好的有15例,愈合优良率62.50%,A组患者愈合优良率显著高于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:骨增量技术中种植修复对于上颌前牙缺失的具有良好的修复效果,并且修复过后骨组织和植体之间也获得了良好的覆盖,保证了修复的成功率。 Objective:To study the effect of different cropping system in evaluation of implant in bone augmentation technology. Methods : 72 patients with maxillary anterior teeth loss were randomly divided into Groups A, B, C The patients in Group A were given the bone incremental technology of planting methods. Group B were adopted the method of invisible denture repair surgery, while Group C were treated with PFM crown and bridge technique for missing anterior tooth repair surgery. The healing of all patients were ob- served, and the X - ray examination were compared 3 - 6, 9 months after maxillary repair, the implant and the surrounding tissue heal- ing were observed. Results: Implant and the surrounding bone healing were good in 22 cases, healing was 91.67% ; Group B of 14 ca- ses healed well, healing was 58.33% ; Group C has 15 cases healed well, healing was 62.50%, Group A of patients healed was sig- nificantly higher than that of Group B and C, the it difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The bone implant prosthesis for maxillary anterior teeth loss in incremental technology has good repair effect, and got good coverage between bone and im- plant after the repair,which guarantee the success rate of repair.
作者 吴琴艳
出处 《牡丹江医学院学报》 2014年第1期12-14,共3页 Journal of Mudanjiang Medical University
关键词 骨增量技术 牙种植 上颌前牙缺失 疗效 Bone incremental technology Dental implants Absence of maxillary anterior teeth
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1Keyf F. Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2001, 28(9):821-829.
  • 2Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1995,6:227-231.
  • 3Ihara K, Goto M, Miyahara A, et al. Multicenter experience with maxillary prostheses supported by Bratnemark implants: a clinical report[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998,13:531-538.
  • 4Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF, et al. Surgical modifications to the Branemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003,18(2):232-237.
  • 5Malevez C, Daelemans P, Adriaenssens P, et al. Use of zygomatic implants to deal with resorbed posterior maxillae [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2003,33:82-89.
  • 6Van Steenberghe VD, Malevez C, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003,14(1):131-136.
  • 7Triplett RG, Schow SR, Laskin KM.Oral and maxillofacial surgery advances in implant dentistry [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2000,15:47-55.
  • 8Chang YM, Coskunfirat OK, Wei FC, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with a fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap and simultaneous insertion of osseointegrated dental implants [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004, 113(4): 1140-1145.
  • 9Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, et al. Measurement of the Maxilla and Zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001,59:1193-1198.
  • 10Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, et al. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001,86:352-363.

共引文献29

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部