摘要
国内学术界在对马克思关于资本的文明作用思想的研究中,存在着简单化和表面化的缺陷。在马克思的经济学理论中,明显地存在着两种性质不同的资本概念,即商品经济中的资本和披着资本主义经济关系外衣的局部奴隶制经济中的资本。商品经济中的资本的天性是自由和平等,而披着资本主义经济关系外衣的局部奴隶制经济中的资本,在资本主义商品经济的发展过程中,早已失去了客观实在性。马克思所说的"资本的伟大的文明作用",主要表现为商品经济的资本创造出资产阶级社会,推动生产力的巨大发展,实现社会关系的革命性变革,为未来新社会的产生创造出各种有利的因素。
There are some defects in Chinese scholars＂ studies of Marx＂ thoughts about the role of capital in the development of civilization. Their studies tend to be superficial or simplified. According to Marxist theory about economies, there are two kinds of capital, namely, capital in commodity economy and capital in partial slavery under the disguise of capitalist economic relationship. Capital in commodity economy features freedom and equality, while capital in partial slavery under the disguise of capitalist economic relationship has lost its objective reality in the development of capitalist commodity economy. According to Marx, the great civilization role of capital in commodity economy is mainly demonstrated by the fact that the capital in the commodity economy created the bourgeois？society, boosted the productivity, achieved a revolutionary transformation of the social relationships and created various favorable factors for the new coming society.
作者
周德海
ZHOU Dehai(Scientific Research Office,Hefei Administration College,Chaohu, Anhui ,23800)
出处
《管理学刊》
CSSCI
2017年第1期10-20,共11页
Journal of Management
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(12AZD103)
关键词
马克思
资本
文明作用
Marx, Capital, Role of Capital in Development of Civilization
