期刊文献+

中美青少年自恋与网络欺负行为的关系:社会地位不安全感的中介作用 被引量:5

The Association among Narcissism, Social Status Insecurity and Cyberbullying:A Cross Culture Study
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究采用儿童自恋人格问卷、网络欺负行为量表和社会地位不安全感问卷,通过对890名中美青少年的问卷调查,探讨了青少年自恋与网络欺负行为的关系以及社会地位不确定感的中介效应。结果发现:(1)中美两国青少年在社会地位不安全感上存在显著差异;(2)自恋、社会地位不安全感和网络欺负行为两两之间均显著正相关;(3)青少年自恋可以正向预测网络欺负行为,同时社会地位不安全感在自恋和网络欺负行为之间起中介作用;(4)中美两国样本社会地位不安全中介模型均可接受,但在部分路径上存在显著差异。 The current study investigated the mediating effect of social status insecurity between narcissism and cyberbullying and explored whether these relationships varied between Chinese and US adolescents. Childhood narcissism scale, self-reported cyber aggression scale and social status insecurity scale were ad- ministered to 407 Chinese and 483 US adolescents. Results showed that: (1) US adolescents had higher levels of social status insecurity than Chinese adolescents; (2) Narcissism and social status insecurity were all positively correlated with cyberbullying in the adolescents; (3) Narcissism had a positive prediction on cyberbullying, and social status insecurity mediated the relationship between narcissism and cyberbullying; (4) The mediation model was accepted among both Chinese and US sample. However both pathway be- tween narcissism and cyberbullying and pathway between social statue insecurity and cyberbullying varied across the nation.
作者 盖晓然 雷雳 付晓洁 王兴超 Ge Xiaoran Lei Li Fu Xiaojie Wang Xingchao(Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872 The High School Affiliated to Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024)
出处 《心理研究》 2016年第6期73-80,共8页 Psychological Research
基金 北京市社会科学基金重点项目(15sha005) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地(天津师范大学心理与行为研究院)重大项目(14jjd190005)资助
关键词 青少年 自恋 网络欺负行为 社会地位不确定感 adolescents narcissism cyberbullying social status insecurity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献8673

同被引文献89

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部