摘要
中华环保联合会案蕴含着宽松的原告资格甚至认可行政公益诉讼的隐喻,不过整体来看,目前理论界和实务部门对政府信息公开诉讼所奉行的宽松原告资格抱有一定的怀疑态度。无论是行政实践还是司法裁判,把政府信息公开申请人中的"特殊需要"作限缩解释似乎占居主导地位。目前,政府信息公开诉讼给行政诉讼带来真正冲击的是,只要提出政府信息公开即可获得原告资格,将案件带入实体审理,远未到确立行政公益诉讼的程度。立足于未来发展,在保护私人权益的行政诉讼框架中适度引入行政公益诉讼,是发展方向。
The Chinese environmental federation case contains a loose of plaintiff qualification even recognizes the metaphor of public welfare administrative litigation, but now the whole world theory and practice of the government department hold out a certain amount of skepticism for public information action in this loose pursues with plaintiff qualification.Whether it＇s administrative judicial practice or the referee, the government information public applicants in the ＂special needs＂ limited for reduction in which to live explain seems to be accounted for dominance.At present, the real impact bringing by the government information public litigation administrative litigation is, putting forward as long as the government information can be publicly for the plaintiffs qualification, case will be brought into the entity trial, far from established to public welfare administrative litigation levels.Based on future development, introducing modestly of public welfare administrative litigation in protecting the rights and interests of private administrative litigation framework, is development direction.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期60-74,共15页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
政府信息公开
申请人资格
原告资格
特殊需要
行政公益诉讼
Government Information Public
The Applicant Qualification
The Plaintiff Qualification
Special Needs
Public Welfare Administrative Litigation
