期刊文献+

注意缺陷多动障碍共患抑郁障碍儿童的执行功能特点 被引量:4

Executive function characteristic in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbid depressive disorders
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)共患抑郁障碍儿童的执行功能特点。方法:选取符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-IV)诊断标准的ADHD共患抑郁障碍(ADHD+DD)、ADHD未共患抑郁障碍(ADHD-DD)儿童,以及年龄、性别匹配的正常对照儿童各30例,采用Rey复杂图形测试、连线测试、Stroop色词命名任务对其执行功能的各个维度进行评估。结果:ADHD-DD组完成连线测试任务B试所需时间长于对照组[(125.0±60.8)svs.(92.6±50.0)s,P<0.05],ADHD+DD组及ADHD-DD组的转换时间z分高于对照组[(0.2±0.7),(0.3±1.0)vs.(-0.5±1.1),P<0.01]。ADHD+DD组及ADHD-DD组完成Stroop色词命名任务4试耗时均长于对照组[(40.3±10.8)s,(40.8±10.2)s vs.(34.0±7.6)s,P<0.05]。ADHD+DD组及ADHD-DD组在任何任务成绩上的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:ADHD患儿在反应抑制能力、定势转换能力方面均存在明显的缺陷,共病抑郁障碍可能并不加重ADHD患儿的执行功能缺陷。 Objective: To study the executive function (EF) characteristics in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbid depressive disorder (DD). Methods: Children with a di- agnosis of ADHD comorbid DD (ADHD + DD), ADHD without comorbid DD (ADHD-DD) and normal controls (n = 30 for each group) took part in the study. All three groups were matched by age and gender. The diagnoses were made according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The Rey-Osterrieth complex Figure Test, the Trail Making Test and the Stroop Color Word Test were administered to assess multiple dimensions of executive functions. Results: ADHD-DD group took a longer time than normal controls in time of test B Trail Making Test [ ( 125.0 ± 60. 8) s vs. (92. 6 ± 50. 0) s, P 〈 0. 05]. Both ADHD + DD and ADHD-DD groups had higher z-scores than normal controls on the shift time of the Trail Making Test [ (0. 2±0. 7), (0. 3± 1.0) vs. ( - 0. 5 ± 1.1), P 〈 0.01 ]. Both ADHD + DD and ADHD-DD groups spent longer time than normal controls in the naming color of the color-word card ( Stroop part 4) [ (40. 3 ± 10. 8) s, (40. 8 ±10. 2)s vs. (34. 0 ± 7.6) s, P 〈 0. 05]. There were no statistical differences between the ADHD + DD group and ADHD-DD group on any executive function tasks (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that ADHD is related to executive function deficit, whether or not comorbid depressive disorder. Comorbid depressive disorder might not have additional influence on the executive function characteristics of children and adolescents with ADHD.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期829-834,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2014CB846104) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAI13B01) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81571340)
关键词 注意缺陷多动障碍 抑郁障碍 执行功能 共病 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder depressive disorder executive function comorbidity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1戴晓阳,龚耀先.韦氏成人智力量表中国修订本与原量表(WAIS和WAIS-R)因素分析的比较研究[J].心理学报,1987,19(1):70-78. 被引量:20
  • 2寇建华,杜亚松,夏黎明.儿童长处和困难问卷(父母版)上海常模的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(1):25-28. 被引量:220
  • 3寇建华,杜亚松,夏黎明.长处和困难问卷(学生版)上海常模的制订[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(1):3-5. 被引量:109
  • 4龚耀先 蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993..
  • 5徐韬园.Conners儿童行为问卷[J].上海精神医学,1990,2(2):46-46.
  • 6许淑莲.脑梗塞病人的词语流畅性研究[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1988,21:206-206.
  • 7梁永亮.中国注意缺陷多动障碍样本的评估和诊断.2000年精神病学新进展高级讲习班讲义[M].北京:北京大学精神卫生研究所,国际神经-精神药理学会(CINP),2000..
  • 8王玉凤 曾文星.中国儿童气质特点.华人的心理与治疗[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1997.87-109.
  • 9徐通 苏渊 等.注意障碍多动综合征患儿就诊症状的分析[J].中华精神科杂志,1997,30:256-256.
  • 10顾伯美 王玉凤 等.学习困难与多动症儿童智力因素对照研究[J].北京医科大学学报,1995,27:48-49.

共引文献163

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部