期刊文献+

多动症儿童持续反应抑制与注意缺陷冲动行为障碍的关系 被引量:17

Relationship between inhibition of ongoing responses with attention deficit and behavior disorder
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨多动症(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)儿童的持续反应抑制缺陷与其注意水平和冲动行为的关系,为多动症认知功能康复训练提供参考。方法选取浙江省立同德医院就诊的43名诊断为多动症儿童和36名健康儿童为被试,采用视觉持续性任务(Visual CPT)评估注意水平,采用相似图形匹配(MFFT)任务评估冲动行为,采用停止信号任务(stop-signal task,SST)评估持续反应抑制。结果在SST中,ADHD儿童的错误率高于对照组(t=4.34,P<0.01)。SST的错误率与CPT的漏报率相关有统计学意义(r=0.45,P<0.01);两者具有线性相关,回归分析显示线性回归有统计学意义(t=3.21,P<0.01),持续反应抑制能解释注意水平的20.1%。多动症儿童SST的错误率与MFFT的错误个数相关无统计学意义(r=0.09,P>0.05)。SST错误率受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.77,划界值为15.5。结论多动症儿童存在持续反应抑制缺陷,持续抑制缺陷与注意缺陷存在正相关。被试在停止信号任务中的错误率若高于15.5,可考虑为多动症。 Objective To examine the relationship between inhibition of ongoing responses deficit with attention deficit and behavior disorder among ADHD children. Methods Totally 43 children with attention deficit hyperac tivity disorder( ADHD) aged 6-14 years who met the DSM-V criteria for ADHD were recruited. And 38 health children were recruited as the control group. Vision Continuous Performance Task( CPT) and Matching Familiar Figures Test were used to assess attention deficit and behavior disorder feature of the ADHD children. Stop-signal paradigm was used to assess the inhibition of ongoing responses. Results In the stop-signal paradigm, the ADHD children’s error rate was significantly higher than typically developing children( t = 4. 34, P <0.01). The ADHD children error rate in the stop-signal task was positively correlated with the wrong number miss rate in CPT task( r = 0.45, P<0.01), similar finding was observed in regression analysis,with inhibition of ongoing responses accounted for 20.1% of attention deficit( t = 3.21,P<0.01). In ROC curve analysis, the cut-off sore was 15.50 in the task. The error rate in stop-signal task showed no association with miss rate in Matching Familiar Figures Test( r = 0.09, P>0.05). Conclusion Inhibition of ongoing responses among ADHD children is associated with attention deficit, but not with existence of behavior disorder.
作者 汤路瀚 韩煜昉 余鸽 蓝慧燕 徐方忠 TANG Luhan;HAN Yufang;YU Ge;LAN Huiyan;XU Fangzhong(Clinical Psychology Department,Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou(310012),China;不详)
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第5期736-738,743,共4页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2C21810) 浙江省自然科学基金/探索项目(LQ20C090001) 国家中医药管理局国家重点学科建设计划(国中医药人教[2012]32号)。
关键词 注意力缺陷障碍伴多动 反应抑制 冲动行为 精神卫生 回归分析 儿童 Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity Reactive inhibition Impulsive behavior Mental health Regression analysis Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1李建英,邹小兵,静进,唐春,陈凯云.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童执行功能特征[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(3):162-165. 被引量:21
  • 2吴丽慧,沈晓明,汤春萍,王慧丽,留佩宁,徐正祄.失配性负波在注意缺陷多动障碍和品行障碍患儿中的应用研究[J].中国预防医学杂志,2005,6(2):96-98. 被引量:5
  • 3范方,苏林雁,耿耀国,王洪.注意缺陷多动障碍诊断量表父母版构想效度的验证性因素分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):572-573. 被引量:3
  • 4Aron A R, Fletcher P C, Bullmore E T, et al. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 2003, 6 (2):115 - 116.
  • 5Kok A. Varieties of inhibition : manifestations in cognition, eventrelated potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 1999, 101:129- 158.
  • 6Carter C S, M, J D. Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention : An H215O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance.Neuroimage,1995,2 (4) : 264 -272.
  • 7Proctor R W, Lu C, Wang H, et al. Activation of response codes relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychologica, 1995,90:275 - 286.
  • 8Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7(3) :134 - 140.
  • 9Meiran N, Chorev Z, Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 41:211 - 253.
  • 10van Veen V, Cohen J D, Botvinick M M, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. Neuroimage,2001, 14:1302 - 1308.

共引文献38

同被引文献158

引证文献17

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部