期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺等离子切除术与钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性对比研究 被引量:9

To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tansurethral Plasma Resection and Holmium Laser Enucleation for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较等离子切除术与钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效及安全性。方法于2015年9月—2016年6月,随机选取该院收治的60例良性前列腺增生患者随机分为两组,钬激光组实施钬激光剜除术,电切组实施等离子切除术。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱冲洗时间、并发症发生率。结果钬激光组的手术时间较电切组明显更长(P<0.05),但钬激光组的术中出血量、膀胱冲洗时间分别为(53.45±26.43)m L、(25.89±14.53)h,均较电切组明显更少(P<0.05)。钬激光组的并发症发生率为10%,较电切组的33.33%明显更低(P<0.05)。结论经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效显著,且安全性高。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of the plasmakinetic resection and holmium laser enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods Random selection in September 2015 — June 2016, 60 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients in our hospital were selected and divided into two groups, Holmium laser group received holmium laser enucleation, and electric cutting group received transurethral resection. The operation time, blood loss, bladder irrigation time, incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The surgery time of Holmium laser group which compared with electric cutting group was significantly longer(P〈0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss and bladder irrigation time were(53.45±26.43)m L,(25.89±14.53)h, and were significantly less than those of the electro resection group(P〈0.05). The complication rate of the holmium laser group was 10%, was significantly lower than that the control group which was 33.33%(P〈0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of holmium laser enucleation in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is significantly, and safety is high.
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第27期88-90,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 前列腺增生 钬激光剜除术 等离子切除术 Prostatic hyperplasia Holmium laser enucleation Plasma resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1杜传军,白福鼎,陈继民,裘益青,经霄,罗尉,顾才校.前列腺钬激光剜出术与电切术安全性及疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(9):627-630. 被引量:43
  • 2徐伟,刘成倍,王祥林.输尿管镜硬镜结合钬激光治疗输尿管结石(附235例报告)[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2007,12(2):122-123. 被引量:65
  • 3吴阶平.泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2000.374-379.
  • 4Varkarakis J, Bartsch G, Horninger W,et al. Long-term morbidity andmortality of transurethral prostatectomy:a 10-year follow-up. Prostate,2004,58(3) :248 -251.
  • 5Fayad AS, Sheikh MG, Zakaria T, et al. Holmium laser enuclea- tion versus bipolar resection of the prostate: a prospective ran- domized study. Which to choose? [ J ]. J Endourol, 2011,25 : 1347-1352.
  • 6Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ, et al. Holmium laser enueleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial re- suits [J]. J Urol, 2012, 187: 1336-1340.
  • 7Ishikawa R, Shitara T, Wakatabe Y, et al. Relationship between morcellation efficiency and enucleated tissue weight in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for patients with be- nign prostatic hyperplasia [ J]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 2011, 102: 675-678.
  • 8Hwang JC, Park SM, Lee JB. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: effectiveness, safety, and overcoming of the learning curve [ J]. Korean J Urol, 2010, 51 : 619-624.
  • 9Shah HN,Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmiurn laser enucleation of the prostate [J]. J Urol, 2007, 177: 1468-1474.
  • 10Madersbacher S,Alivizatos G,Nordling J. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment,therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines)[J].European Urology,2004.547-554.

共引文献270

同被引文献67

引证文献9

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部