摘要
目前我国立法对地质调查成果的权利归属并未作出专门规定,实践中权属具有模糊性,阻碍了成果的社会化服务进程。地质调查成果属于智力成果、无形资产,根据立法法的原则,应优先适用科技进步法以及知识产权法。从科技进步法和知识产权法的相关规定可以看出,除了法律明确规定的情形以外,知识产权的权利归属很大程度上取决于双方的约定。具体约定的方式,应当根据地调成果的来源、类别以及利用方式上的差别作出选择。
At present, the legislation in China hasn＇t set provisions to the right of geological survey results. In the practice, the attribution of ownership is indistinct, which obstructs the social service process of survey results. Geological survey results pertain to intellectual results the intangible assets which would be preferentially applied with law on science and technology progress and intellectual property law according to principles of legislation law. Except for situation that is explicitly stipulated by law, from the view of related provisions of intellectual property law and law on science and technology progress, the ownership of intellectual property rights depends on agreement of two parties to a large extent. The specific patterns of agreement should be selected on the basis of different sources, categories and utilization patterns of geological survey results.
出处
《中国矿业》
北大核心
2016年第8期10-13,共4页
China Mining Magazine
基金
中国地质调查局地学知识库建设项目资助(编号:1212011220300)
关键词
地调成果
知识产权
权利归属
geological survey result
intellectual property
attribution of right
