期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因用于上肢淋巴静脉吻合患者臂丛阻滞的效果分析 被引量:14

Effects of brachial plexus block with different doses of Ropivacaine on lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery for patients with upper limb lymphedema
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同浓度罗哌卡因在淋巴水肿患者淋巴静脉吻合术中的臂丛阻滞效果。方法随机选择90例择期行上肢淋巴静脉吻合术患者,随机均分为A、B、C 3组,分别予以0.200%罗哌卡因30ml,0.250%罗哌卡因30 ml及0.375%罗哌卡因30 ml,在超声引导下经肌间沟入路行臂丛神经阻滞。评估3组患者感觉阻滞起效时间(T_1)、运动阻滞起效时间(T_2)、感觉阻滞完善时间(T_3)、镇痛持续时间(T_4)、运动阻滞恢复时间(T_5)、运动阻滞程度、患者满意度及不良事件。结果 1A、B、C 3组患者感觉阻滞起效时间分别为(4.06±0.60)、(3.17±0.72)和(2.16±0.63)min,运动阻滞起效时间分别为(6.33±0.93)、(5.52±0.93)和(4.35±1.02)min。各指标组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=65.316和32.502,P=0.000);23组患者随着罗哌卡因浓度的升高,感觉阻滞完善时间逐渐缩短,组间差异有统计学意义(F=25.496,P=0.000)。而镇痛持续时间及运动阻滞恢复时间随着罗哌卡因浓度升高逐渐延长,组间差异有统计学意义(F=27.066和25.787,P=0.000);3在注药后15 min,C组患者运动阻滞程度≥3级比例高于其余两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);注药后30 min,C组患者运动阻滞达≥3级比例高于A、B两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而A组患者存在明显的感觉运动阻滞分离现象。3组患者满意度分别为80%、87%和93%。结论对于上肢淋巴静脉吻合术患者,选择0.250%罗哌卡因30 ml行肌腱沟臂丛神经阻滞感觉阻滞,能够满足手术要求,是安全可行的。 Objective To discuss the effects of different doses of Ropivacaine on the brachial plexus block for lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery in patients with upper limb lymphedema. Methods Ninty patients with upper limb lymphedema were randomly divided into groups A, B and C, which received brachial plexus block with 0.200% Ropivacaine 30 ml, 0.250% Ropivacaine 30 ml and 0.375% Ropivacaine 30 ml respectively. Sensory block onset time (T1), motion block onset time (T2), ideal sensory block time (T3), analgesia duration (T4), motor block recovery time (T5), degree of motor block, patient satisfaction and adverse events were assessed in all the subjects. Results The sensory block onset time (T1), motion block onset time (T2) and ideal sensory block time (T3) were all the shortest in the group C (0.375% Ropivacaine 30 ml), and the longest in the group A (0.200% Ropivacaine 30 ml), the differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P 〈 0.01); whereas, compared among the three groups, both analgesia duration (T4) and motor block recovery time (T5) were the shortest in the group A, and the longest in the gorup C with significant differences (P 〈 0.01). Besides, the degree of motor block and patient satisfaction increased gradually with the increasing dose of Ropivacaine, there were significant differences among the three groups (P 〈 0.05). There were 3 adverse events in the group A with incomplete blockage. Conclusions The application of 0.250% Ropivacaine is a good choice for brachial plexus block in secondary lymphedema patients with lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery. It can meet the requirements of the operation.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第11期117-121,共5页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 罗哌卡因 臂丛阻滞 淋巴静脉吻合 淋巴水肿 Ropivacaine brachial plexus block lymphatic venous anastomosis lymphedema
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1LI M, WAN L, MEI W, et al. Update on the clinical utility and practical use of ropivacaine in Chinese patients[J]. Drug Des De- vel Ther, 2014, 9(8): 1269-1276.
  • 2JADON A, DIXIT S, KEDIA S K, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopic surgery: prospective ran- domised controlled study of effects of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with dexamethasone[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2015, 59(3): 171-176.
  • 3姚长智,张伟,方力,何锡强,苑贵敏,张晓光.屈肌腱松解术后功能锻炼患者罗哌卡因或布比卡因臂丛阻滞的最低镇痛浓度[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(6):422-424. 被引量:11
  • 4GEN MORALAR D, AYGEN TI~RKMEN U, ALTAN A, et al. The comparison of epidural continuous infusion and epidural pa- tient controlled bolus administration in labor analgesia[J]. Agri, 2013, 25(1): 19-26.
  • 5CASATI A, FANELLI G, TORRI G, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a dou- ble-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine[J]. Br JAnaesth, 1999, 83(6): 872-875.
  • 6RIDNER S H, DIETRICH M S. Development and validation of the lymphedema symptom and intensity survey-arm[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2015, 23(10): 3103-3112.
  • 7BATISTA B N, GERMAIN M, FARIA J C, et al. Lymph node flap transfer for patients with secondary lower limb lymphedema[J]. Microsurgery, 2015, 3(16): 10.
  • 8GEBRUERS N, VERBELEN H, de VRIEZE T, et al. Incidence and time path of lymphedema in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(6): 1131-1139.
  • 9GRIGG E, ANDERSON C, PANKOVICH M, et al. Systemic ropivacaine toxicity from a peripheral nerve infusion in a medi- cally complex patient[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2015, 27(4): 338-340.
  • 10RETTIG H C, LEROU J G, GIELEN M J, et al. The pharma- cokinetics of ropivacaine after four different techniques of brachial plexus blockade[J]. Anaesthesia, 2007, 62(10): 1008-1014.

二级参考文献23

  • 1吴道珠,徐旭仲,李挺,黄品同,黄福光,吕夕明,杨琰,邹春鹏.高频超声对臂丛神经显像和定位的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(6):449-452. 被引量:32
  • 2徐小智,肖勤,常军,万明卿,胡小勇,吴华苗.超声引导下肌间沟法臂丛神经阻滞的临床研究[J].江西医药,2006,41(12):956-957. 被引量:10
  • 3金烈烈,徐旭仲,吴道珠,高伟阳.臂丛神经的超声影像学研究[J].中华手外科杂志,2007,23(4):248-251. 被引量:13
  • 4Chelly JE, Casati A, Fanelli G, et al. Continuous peripheral nerve block techniques: an illustrated guide. Segnate: Mosby, 2001.3-23.
  • 5Fanelli G. Peripheral nerve block with electric-neurostimulation. Minerva Anesthesiol, 1992, 58: 1025-1026.
  • 6顾玉东.手的修复和再造[M].上海:上海医科大学出版,1995.267.
  • 7Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, et al. Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivaine for epidural analgesia in labor.Anesthesiology, 2003, 99: 1354-1358.
  • 8Capogna G, Celleno D, Fuxo P, et al. Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labor. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 82: 371-373.
  • 9Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, et al. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor.Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 944-950.
  • 10Dixon WJ. Staircase Bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehavioral Rev, 1999, 15: 47-50.

共引文献116

同被引文献81

引证文献14

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部