期刊文献+

贸易自由化、行业异质性与出口产品质量升级 被引量:3

Trade Liberalization,Industry Heterogeneity and the Quality Upgrading of Export Product
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用产品层面的关税数据和贸易数据,将产品归类到行业,在测度贸易自由化程度和出口产品质量的基础上,利用2000-2011年中国27个制造行业的面板数据,实证分析贸易自由化对出口产品质量的影响及其在不同行业间的差异性体现。实证结果表明:以最终产品关税率和中间投入品关税率为表征的贸易自由化有利于出口产品质量的提升,且中间投入品关税率的作用更为明显;在不同特征的行业中,贸易自由化对出口产品质量的影响是不同的,其对研发强度低、行业质量阶梯短、人均工资低及劳动资本密集度小的行业的出口产品质量提升作用更为显著。 This paper uses the product-level tariffs and trade data to classify the products into industries. Then on the basis of the measure of the extent of trade liberalization and the quality of expert products, this paper empirically analyzes the effect of trade liberalization on the export product quality and the different effects among different industries by using panel data of China's 27 manufacturing between 2000 and 2011. The results show that trade liberalization which is char- acterized by output tariff and intermediate inputs tariff has a significant positive impact on the quality upgrading of expert product, and intermediate inputs tariff is more effective. In different industries, the effect of trade liberalization on export product quality is different. The effect is more significant in those industries with low R&D intensity, short quality lad- ders, low per capita wage or low per capita volume of capital.
出处 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期95-101,共7页 Commercial Research
关键词 贸易自由化 出口产品质量 行业异质性 关税减让 trade liberalization export product quality industry heterogeneity tariff reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1Baldwin, R. , and Harrigan, J. , Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence. NBER Working Paper , No. 13214,2007.
  • 2Baldwin, R. , and Robert-Nicoud, F. , Trade and Growth with Heterogeneous Firms. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 74, 2008, pp. 21-34.
  • 3Bernard, A. B. and Jenson, J. B. , Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause ,Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 47, 1999, pp. 1-25.
  • 4Bernard, A. B. , Eaton J. , Jensen J. B. and Kortum S. , Plants and Productivity in International Trade. American Economic Review, Vol. 93, 2003,pp. 1268-1290.
  • 5Bernard, A. B. , Jensen, J. B. and Schott, P. K. , Trade Costs, Firms and Productivity. Journalof Monetary Econom- ics, Vol. 53, 2006, pp. 917-937.
  • 6Brainard, S. L. , An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-off between Multinational Sales and Trade. American Economic Review, Vol. 87, 1997, pp. 520-544.
  • 7Girma, S. , Kneller, R. and Pisu, M. , Export Versus FDI: an Empirical Test. Review of World Economics, Vol. 141, 2005, pp. 193 -218.
  • 8Gervais, A. , Price, Quality, and International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Unpublished, University of Maryland, 2009.
  • 9Gustafsson, P. and Segerstrom, P. , Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 5894, 2006.
  • 10Hallak, J. C. , Product Quality and the Direction o~ Trade. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 68, 2006, pp. 238-265.

共引文献108

同被引文献72

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部