摘要
目的:探究比较尿常规检验与C-反应蛋白诊断小儿急性阑尾炎的价值。方法:本研究选取2013年11月-2014年11月期间来我院治疗的疑似急性阑尾炎的小儿患者120例,平均分为对照组、观察组和实验组,其中对照组采用尿常规检验诊断方法,观察组采用C-反应蛋白诊断方法,实验组采用尿常规检验联合C-反应蛋白诊断方法,之后经过手术病理检测确诊,比较三组在不同诊断方法下的准确率和误诊率。结果:实验组检测方法下确诊为急性阑尾炎共29例,经手术查证,诊断准确率为96.67%,明显高于对照组和观察组患儿的诊断准确率(P<0.05);实验组急性阑尾炎的误诊例数为1例,误诊率为3.33%,明显低于对照组和观察组患儿的误诊率(P<0.05);以上差异均具有统计学意义。结论:临床上采用尿常规检验联合C-反应蛋白诊断小儿急性阑尾炎,能够有效提高诊断的准确率,降低误诊概率,具有一定的诊断价值,对于急性阑尾炎的确诊以及治疗具有重要的意义,值得临床推广应用。
Objective： To investigate and compare values of urine-routine text and C- reactive protein for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Methods： 120 patients were divided into the control group, the observation group and the experiment group. The control group was diagnosed by urine-routine text; the observation group was diagnosed by C- reactive protein; the experiment group was diagnosed by urine-routine text and C- reactive protein. Then they were diagnosed by pathological examination. Accuracy and misdiagnosis in three groups were compared. Results： 29 cases in the experiment group were diagnosed, with 96.67% accuracy, higher than that in the other groups（P〈0.05）. 1 case in the experiment group was misdiagnosed, with 3.33% misdiagnosis, lower than that in the other groups（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Urine-routine text and C- reactive protein for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children could improve accuracy, and was worthy of promotion.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2016年第2期122-123,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
尿常规检验
C-反应蛋白
小儿急性阑尾炎
临床应用
Urine-routine text
C-reactive protein
Acute appendicitis in children
Clinical application
