摘要
行政机关进行诉权告知成为行政诉讼起诉期限的起算点,是由司法解释逐步确立的。在新《行政诉讼法》建立新的起诉期限制度以后,该项制度面临着是否继续适用的问题。《最高人民法院关于执行<中华人民共和国行政诉讼法>若干问题的解释》(以下简称《若干解释》)第41条实质上是在法定标准以外增加了新的起算点,针对所有的行政行为,行政机关如未履行告知义务,法院一般直接适用两年的起诉期限,除非有特殊情形的推断。新法施行后的司法实践中,法院叠加适用或者选择适用两年期限和新的6个月期限。基于诉权告知制度在我国行政程序法中的地位,我们有必要对诉权告知与起诉期限之间的相关性进行检讨,并且对其适用范围进行类型化改造。
The notification of litigation right by administrative organs becomes the startingpoint of ac tion limitation in administrative litigation, which was gradually established by judicial interpretations. After the establishment of new action limitation by new Administrative Litigation Law ar ticles, the star ting-point system is faced with problem of effectiveness. Ar ticle 41 of the old judicial interpretation has created a new starting-point beyond the de jure standards. If the administrative organs have not enforced the notification obligation concerning all the administrative acts, cour ts will apply the 2-year action limitation directly unless par ticular conditions can be deduced. In the judicial practice since the enforcement of new law, cour ts have been applying both the 2-year and the new 6-month action limitation cumulatively or selectively. Considering the status of the notification system under our administrative procedure law, we should review the relationship between the notification of litigation right and action limitation and transform the scope of application by categorization.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期84-93,共10页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
诉权告知
行政诉讼
起算期限
起算点
行政程序
Notification of Litigation Right
Administrative Litigation
Action Limitation
Starting Point
Administrative Procedure
