摘要
我国现行立法关于起诉期限的规定具有撤销诉讼一体主义的特征,未来应从诉讼类型的角度完善行政诉讼规则,从而完善包括起诉期限在内的时效规定。具体而言,撤销诉讼继续适用现行立法规定的起诉期限;由于拒绝行为产生的给付诉讼也应当适用起诉期限的规定,而消极不作为给付诉讼可以考虑适用公法上请求权的消灭时效(诉讼时效)或者权利失效制度予以规范;确认诉讼不需要规定起诉期限,而是通过诉的利益和确认诉讼的补充性规则防止原告滥用诉权。
Considering the prosecution time limit regulations, there is the feature of revocation litigation unanimism in China＇s current legislation. So the future administrative procedure law should be perfected from the litigation type angle, including the time limit regulations such as the prosecution time limit. Specifically, the existing regulations should be applied to the revocation litigation and the prestation litigation due to refusal actions. And the limitation of action or the vetavirkung system in the public law may be considered for the prestation litigation due to negative omissions. Moreover, no time limit should be set for the confirming litigation because litigation interests and related supplementary rules should be confirmed to prevent the plaintiff from abusing the right of litigation.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期26-30,137,共6页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行政诉讼
起诉期限
诉讼类型
Administrative Litigation
Prosecution Time Limit
Litigation Typer
