期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕缺损及再次妊娠的风险评估 被引量:26

原文传递
导出
摘要 剖宫产是常见的终止妊娠的手术方式,我国的剖宫产率更是达54%[1]。剖宫产术后的子宫瘢痕可造成一些远期并发症,包括再次妊娠时的剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy, CSP)、胎盘植入、子宫破裂,此外,还可能导致阴道不规则流血、慢性腹痛、不孕症等。随着剖宫产次数的增加(第2、3、4、5、6次及以上)择期剖宫产的并发症明显增加,再次妊娠时胎盘植入的发生率分别增加0.3%、0.6%、2.1%、2.3%、6.7%,需行子宫切除以止血的比例分别是0.4%、0.9%、2.4%、3.5%、9.0%,前置胎盘的发生率也明显增加[2]。而随着“单独二孩”政策的开放,更多的剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫面临着再次妊娠的问题,所以,剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的风险评估是我国乃至全球临床面临的重要问题,再次妊娠中比较受关注的问题主要是子宫瘢痕能否耐受妊娠、有无子宫破裂的风险,而目前的研究发现,剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕缺损(cesarean scar defect, CSD)是导致子宫破裂的重要因素。
作者 陈蔚琳 金力
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期718-720,共3页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,李长东,陈奕,阮焱,王欣,贾朝霞,张为远.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,0(10):728-735. 被引量:490
  • 2Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidityassociated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries[J]. ObstetGynecol, 2006, 107(6):1226-1232.
  • 3Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect:correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size,clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol, 2009, 34(1):85-89.
  • 4韦春姣,陈立斌,冯淑英,张小兰.剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损相关因素分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(9):777-780. 被引量:19
  • 5Borges LM, Scapinelli A, de Baptista Depes D, et al.Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with priorcesarean section[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010, 17(3):361-364.
  • 6Fabres C, Arriagada P, FernAndez C, et al. Surgical treatmentand follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due tocesarean section scar defect[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2005, 12(1):25-28.
  • 7Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, et al. Ultrasoundevaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: arandomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 110(4):808-813.
  • 8Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, et al. Systematic review ofesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imagingtechniques and uterine scar defect[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2012,29(5):465-471.
  • 9Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, et al. Impact of single- vsdouble-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterinescardefect: a systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. Am JObstet Gynecol, 2014 ,211(5):453-460.
  • 10Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji 0,et al. Prevalence,potential risk factors for development and symptoms relatedto the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section:systematic reviewfj]. Ultrasound Obstet GynecoJ, 2014, 43(4):372-382.

二级参考文献43

  • 1冯淑英,陈立斌,黄利娟,梁玉萍,陈湘云,杨冬梓.剖宫产切口宫壁缺损的宫腔镜诊断(附48例分析)[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(7):755-758. 被引量:20
  • 2汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 3Wylie B J, Mirza FG. Cesarean delivery in the developing world [ J ]. Clinics in Perinatology,2008,35 ( 3 ) : 571 - 582.
  • 4Davide Lijoi, Ennio A, Biscaldi B. MRI appearance of the low trans- verse incision after caesarean section in a symptomatic woman [ J ]. European Journal of Radiology,2006.59 (1) :133 - 136.
  • 5Osser OV,]okubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in ce- sarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [ J ]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gyneco1,2009,34 (1) :90- 97.
  • 6Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2008,31 ( 1 ) :72 - 77.
  • 7Wang CB,Chiu WW,Lee CY,et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34 ( 1 ) : 85 - 89.
  • 8Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects : a- greement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement [ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2010,35 (1) :75 -83.
  • 9Bij de, Vaate AJM, Bronlmann HA, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2011,37 ( 1 ) :93 - 99.
  • 10Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticulum : ap- pearance on hysterosalpingography [ J ]. MR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(4) :870 - 874.

共引文献507

同被引文献198

  • 1薛娜茹,杨慧霞.妊娠期糖尿病与妊娠期高血压疾病的相互影响[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(5):9-11. 被引量:15
  • 2陶雯琪,刘伯宁.剖宫产后子宫憩室一例[J].中华围产医学杂志,2004,7(4):254-254. 被引量:16
  • 3张鸿慧,何玉宁,刘乔平,吴治恒,张晓岚.653例剖宫产子宫及腹部切口改良缝合临床观察[J].中原医刊,2006,33(12):38-39. 被引量:5
  • 4Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section:systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43(4):372-382.
  • 5Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14:365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3.
  • 6Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(3):525-532.
  • 7Gasim T, Al Jama FE, Rahman MS, et al. Multiple repeat cesarean sections:operative difficulties, maternal complications and outcome [J]. J Reprod Med, 2013, 58(7-8):312-318.
  • 8Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2008, 15(2):172-175.
  • 9Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(1):90-97.
  • 10Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect:correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(1):85-89.

引证文献26

二级引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部