期刊文献+

剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损相关因素分析 被引量:19

Correlative Risk Factors of Post-Caesarean Section Scar Defects
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损的相关因素。方法:2008年1月至2009年4月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院产科行剖宫产并完成电话随访,且于2011年7~10月期间返院行阴道B超检查的经产妇共101例。比较宫壁瘢痕缺损组及完整组临床资料和危险因素分析。结果:剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损的检出率为63.4%。与剖宫产宫壁瘢痕完整组相比,宫壁瘢痕缺损组瘢痕位置更接近宫颈内口(5.49±1.82mm,6.52±2.19mm;P<0.05),宫壁瘢痕缺损组后位子宫较完整组更多(P<0.05),两组年龄、剖宫产次数、阴道试产、子宫缝合层数、手术时间、24小时失血总量、术者年资、产后母乳喂养时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。子宫后位是剖宫产宫壁缺损的危险因素(OR=3.977,95%CI1.683~9.400,P<0.01)。结论:剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损检出率高,瘢痕缺损更接近宫颈内口,子宫后位是其危险因素。 Objective To identify the factors associated with post-caesarean section scar defects (PCSD), Methods:101 women who undergone cesarean section at least once in Sun Yat-sen University Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between January 2008 and April 2009 were followed up by telephone and examination with transvaginal sonography(TVS) during July 2011 and October 2011. Medical records were compared between scar intact and scar defect group,also risk factors correlated with PCSD were analyzed. Results.Of the total 101 patients,63.4% had a technically adequate PCSD pelvic ultrasound images. The area of the post-caesarean section scars of PCSD was more adjacent to the cervical internal os than the pa- tient with intact scars (5.49 ~1.82 mm vs 6.52 ~2.19 mm) ( P〈 0.05) ;the percentage of retroflexed ute- rus was higher in scar defects group than the scar intact group( P 〈 0.05). There were no significant differ- ences in age, number of Cesarean section, induction of labor, suture material, operation time, blood loss in 24 hours,seniority of operator and breastfeeding time between the two groups( P 〉 0.05). Uterine retroflexion was shown to be significantly associated with deficient scars ( OR 3. 977,95% CI 1. 683 -9. 400 ). Conclu- sions:Deficient uterine scar is a frequent finding in women with a previous Cesarean section. Scar with de- fects is located more adjacent to the cervical internal os. Retroflexed uterus is the risk factor of a PCSD.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期777-780,共4页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 广东省自然科学基金(编号:7301394)
关键词 剖宫产 宫壁瘢痕缺损 子宫后位 Cesarean section Scar deficiency Retroposition of uterus
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Wylie B J, Mirza FG. Cesarean delivery in the developing world [ J ]. Clinics in Perinatology,2008,35 ( 3 ) : 571 - 582.
  • 2Davide Lijoi, Ennio A, Biscaldi B. MRI appearance of the low trans- verse incision after caesarean section in a symptomatic woman [ J ]. European Journal of Radiology,2006.59 (1) :133 - 136.
  • 3张为远.中国剖宫产现状与思考[J].实用妇产科杂志,2011,27(3):161-163. 被引量:169
  • 4Osser OV,]okubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in ce- sarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [ J ]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gyneco1,2009,34 (1) :90- 97.
  • 5Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2008,31 ( 1 ) :72 - 77.
  • 6Wang CB,Chiu WW,Lee CY,et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34 ( 1 ) : 85 - 89.
  • 7Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects : a- greement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement [ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2010,35 (1) :75 -83.
  • 8Bij de, Vaate AJM, Bronlmann HA, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2011,37 ( 1 ) :93 - 99.
  • 9Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticulum : ap- pearance on hysterosalpingography [ J ]. MR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(4) :870 - 874.
  • 10冯淑英,陈立斌,黄利娟,梁玉萍,陈湘云,杨冬梓.剖宫产切口宫壁缺损的宫腔镜诊断(附48例分析)[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(7):755-758. 被引量:20

二级参考文献26

  • 1郑平,黄醒华,王淑珍.35年剖宫产率及适应证的变化[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(3):142-145. 被引量:225
  • 2刘玉环,崔英,管睿,惠宁,徐明娟,古航.子宫峡部瘢痕部位妊娠的误诊及治疗[J].上海医学,2006,29(7):493-495. 被引量:18
  • 3李娟清,石一复.七省市剖宫产率调查分析[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(5):306-308. 被引量:63
  • 4[1]FABRES C,ARRIAGADA P,FERNANDEZ C,et al.Surgical treat-ment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to ce-sarean section scar dofect[J].J Minim Invasive Gyneeol,2005,12(1):25-28.
  • 5[2]VAN HORENBEECK A,TEMMERMAN M,DHONT M.Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding[J].Obstet Gynecol,2003,102(5 Pt 2):1137-1139.
  • 6[3]FABRES C,AVILES G,DE LA JARA C,et al.The cesarean delivery scar pouch:clinical implications and diagnostiecorrdation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy[J].J Ultrasound Med,2003,22(7):695-700; quiz 701-702.
  • 7[4]MORRIS H.Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar:is the scar a source of clinical symptoms?[J].Int J Gynecol Pathol,1995,14(1):16-20.
  • 8[5]THURMOND AS,HARVEY WJ,SMITH SA.Cesarean section soar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding:,diagnosis by sonohysterography[J].J Ultrasound Med,1999,18(1):13-6; quiz 17-18.
  • 9[6]ARMSTRONG VANESSA,HANSEN WENDY F,VAN VOORHIS BRADLEY J,et al.Detection of cesarean sears by transvaginal ultra-sound[J].The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Volume,2003,101(1):61-65.
  • 10[7]MONTEAGUDO A,CARRENO C,TIMOR-TRITSCH IE.Saline infu-sion sonohysteragraphy in nonpregnant women with preious cesarean delivery:the "niche" in the sear[J].J Ultrasound Med,2001,20(10):1105-1115.

共引文献199

同被引文献157

引证文献19

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部