期刊文献+

不同茶饮产品的抗氧化能力分析及感官评价 被引量:10

Antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of tea drinks
原文传递
导出
摘要 以总还原能力、DPPH·自由基清除率、·OH清除率、O2-·清除率作为指标,评价了不同茶饮产品的抗氧化能力,并按照《GB/T 23776-2009茶叶感官评审方法》的冲泡方法进行10种茶饮产品的感官评价,以讨论其在消费人群中的接受程度。结果表明,总还原能力由强到弱依次为绿毛峰>坨藏茶>竹叶青>昆仑雪菊>康砖>杭白菊>苦荞胚芽茶>干柠檬>苦荞全株茶>鲜柠檬;对DPPH·自由基清除率最高的为干柠檬,达到了93.58%,最低仅为30.13%(鲜柠檬);对·OH清除率最高的为干柠檬95.87%,最低的为苦荞全株茶17.64%;对O2-·清除率最高的为坨藏茶85.86%,最低的为苦荞全株茶9.08%。在感官评价中,对总分以及汤色、香气、滋味三种因子分别分析,竹叶青分值均最高。结果表明,利用不同抗氧化指标表明的抗氧化能力有所区别,总体而言,干柠檬、竹叶青2种茶饮产品表现出较高的抗氧化活性,而苦荞茶较低。此研究结果可为消费者提供对保健茶饮的消费参考。 The antioxidant capacity of 10 kinds of tea drink products were compared with antioxidant indexes of total reducing ability,free radical scavenging activity of DPPH-,-OH,Q2-. Then their sensory evaluation with GBfr 23776-2009 methods were carried out in order to demonstrate their acceptance levels among consumers. The result showed that the total reducing ability arranged from the strongest to the weakest was:Lv maofeng Tea, Tibet tea, Zhuyeqing, Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt., Kang Tea- brick, Chrysanthemum morifolium, Buckwheat Germ tea, dried Lemon, Buckwheat plants tea, and Fresh Lemon. Besides ,the dried Lemon performed the highest free radicals scavenging activity of DPPH. 93.58%,while Fresh Lemon was the lowest at only 30.13%1 the highest ,OH clearance was 95.87% of dried Lemon ,whereas the lowest of Buckwheat Plant Tea's was only 17.64%. On 02-. clearance,Tibet Tea showed the highest activity at 85.86%,The lowest was Buckwheat Plants Tea at 9.08%. The total score in sensory evaluation showed Zhuyeqing scores the highest in the analysis of three factors-color,aroma,and taste. In these results,the different antioxidant activity was indicated by different antioxidant indexes. Based on the trend,2 products,dried Lemon & Zhuyeqing showed higher antioxidant activity,and the buckwheat tea was lowest. All of results could be considered as a recommendation for consumers.
出处 《食品工业科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第20期164-167,179,共5页 Science and Technology of Food Industry
关键词 茶饮 抗氧化能力 感官评价 tea drink antioxidant capacity sensory evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献169

共引文献516

同被引文献191

引证文献10

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部