期刊文献+

Coflex棘突间动态内固定系统治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症 被引量:5

The treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation system
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Coflex棘突间动态内固定系统治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的近期临床疗效。方法采用腰椎后路椎管减压棘突间植入Coflex棘突间动态内固定系统治疗23例退行性腰椎管狭窄症的患者。患者术前均接受腰椎MRI和CT扫描,证实相应节段因各个原因继发腰椎管狭窄。在患者术前及术后不同时间的腰椎正、侧位及动力位X线片上测量手术间隙椎间隙前、后缘高度及椎间活动范围,采用VAS评分及JOA评分标准进行功能评估。结果患者均获随访,时间15∽24个月。术后患者腰腿痛症状及间歇性跛行均明显缓解,日常生活能力改善。术后3、12个月及末次随访时的VAS评分较术前明显下降,末次随访较术后3、12个月下降,差异有统计学意义( P〈0.05);JOA评分由术前的(14.65±3.80)分改善至术后3个月的(25.12±1.96)分(P〈0.05)。椎间隙后缘高度及椎间孔高度较术前增加(P〈0.05),椎间隙前缘高度较术前略有下降,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);手术节段仍保持一定活动度,但较术前有明显下降(P〈0.05)。所有患者均未出现Coflex系统松动、断裂、脱出及相应棘突的骨折等并发症。结论 Coflex棘突间动态内固定系统治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症可较好地维持相应节段的稳定性、手术节段椎间隙、椎间孔的高度及活动度,近期疗效满意。 Objective To investigate the recent clinical efficacy of spinal non-fusion interspinous Coflex system for the degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods 23 cases with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were treated by decompression with posterior spinous process and interspinous dynamic internal fixation with Coflex system. All cases were scanned by MRI and CT to confirm the segments with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar anteroposteri-or, lateral and flexion-extension X-ray films preoperatively, and at follow-up time were used to measure the following parameters:the anterior and posterior disc space height, foraminal height, the range of motion at surgical level. VAS scores and JOA scores for preoperative and postoperative were used for functional assessment. Results All patients were followed up for 15∽24 months. Patients with low back pain and intermittent claudication were significantly alle-viated postoperatively and activities of daily living were improved. The time in three months,12 months and last follow-up postoperatively compared with the preoperative VAS score decreased significantly. The last follow-up compared with three months and 12 months postoperatively decline,and there was no statistically significant (P〈0. 05). The JOA scores improved from 14. 65 ± 3. 80 in preoperative cases to 25. 12 ± 1. 96 in postoperative cases for 3 months after surgery(P〈0. 05). The disc space posterior height in postoperative cases increased compared with the preoperative cases significantly (P〈0. 05), and gradually decreased with time. Single segment anterior disc space height did not change significantly, the difference was not statistically significant ( P〉0. 05 ) . The operative segment still keep a range of motion after surgery, but the motion decreased significantly (P〈0. 05) compared with the preoperative. No patients suffered Coflex loosening, fracture and emerge. Conclusions The treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with Coflex system has satisfactory effect in minimal invasiveness and high security, which provides a safe and effective therapy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The system can maintain disc height and foraminal height, which is aimed to decrease the ROM of surgical level, its mid-term efficacy is reliable.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2015年第4期402-405,共4页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 腰椎管狭窄 棘突 动态固定 内固定器 lumbar spinal stenosis spinous process dynamic fixation internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Schaeren S, Broger I,Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-upof spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated withdecompression and dynamic stabilization [ J ]. Spine, 2008, 33.18) : E636.
  • 2Cinotti G, De Santis P,Nofroni I, et al. Stenosis of lumbar inter-vertebral foramen : anatomic study on predisposing factors [ J ].Spine,2002, 27(3) :223 -229.
  • 3Ayka B,Copuroglu C,Ozcan M,et al. Postoperative evaluation ofquality of life in lumbar spinal stenosis patients following instru-mented posterior decompression [ J ]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2011, 45(1) :47 -52.
  • 4Hartmann F, Dietz SO,Kuhn S, et al. Biomechanical comparisonof an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adja-cent segment range of motion [ J ]. Acta Chir Orthop TraumatolGech, 2011,78(5);404-409.
  • 5Richter A,Schiitz C,Hauck M,et al. Does an interspinous de-vice (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery inlumbar spinal stenosis. One-year follow up of a prospective casecontrol study of 60 patients[ J]. Eur Spine J, 2010,19(2) :283 -289. J'.
  • 6隋福革,赵丛然,汪群,韩秀英,周冰,李恒,王强,何晓峰.Coflex系统治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(7):767-773. 被引量:6
  • 7Bono C M, Vaccaro A R. Interspinous process devices in the lum-bar spine[ J]., J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20(3) :255 -261.
  • 8Weinstein J N,Tosteson T D,Lurie J D, et al. Surgical versusnonsui^ical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis[ J]. N Engl J Med,2008,358(8):794-810.
  • 9Kong D S, Kim E S, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation afterinterspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with seg-mental instability [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2007, 22(2) : 330 -335.
  • 10Richter A, Halm H F, Hauck M, et al. Two-year follow-up afterdecompteSsive surgery with and without implantation of an interspi-nous device for lumbar spinal stenosis : a prospective controlledstudy[ J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2014T 27(6) :336 -341.

二级参考文献2

共引文献5

同被引文献46

  • 1吴苏稼,林恩及,叶根茂,欧阳先操,王乾兴,邵宣,陈跃先,陈新民.全椎板切除术与腰椎不稳——附202例随访观察[J].医学研究生学报,1994,7(2):43-46. 被引量:4
  • 2卢宁,汤荣光,陈国强,尉乐.改良全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效评价[J].中国伤残医学,2006,14(3):1-3. 被引量:2
  • 3刘尚平,张挺.中医综合疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症78例临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2006,14(6):69-71. 被引量:23
  • 4WEINSTEIN J N, TOSTESON T D, LURIE J D, et al. Surgicalversus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.[J]. NEngl J Med, 2008, 358(8):794-810.
  • 5RICHTER A,HALM HF,HAUCK M,et al. Two-yearfollow-up after decompressive surgery with and withoutimplantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinalstenosis : a prospective controlled study[J]. J Spinal DisordTech, 2014, 27(6): 336-341.
  • 6AUERBACH J D, FIELD J S. Two-Level Coflex- InterlaminarSt abilizat ion Compared to Two-Level Lumbar SpinalFusion for the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with Low-GradeSpondylolisthesis[J]. Spine, 2013, 13(9): S155-S156.
  • 7徐华梓, 倪文飞, 周洋, 等.Cof lex 腰椎棘突间动态固定装置的临床应用评价附108 例中长期随访结果[C].// 第四届中国国际腰椎外科学术会议暨第三届首都骨科高峰论坛论文集.2012:237-238.
  • 8KUMAR N,SHAH SM,NG YH,et al. Role of coflex asan adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinalstenosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2014, 8(2): 161-169.
  • 9WU AM,ZHOU Y,LI QL,et al. Interspinous spacer versustraditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis :a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014,9(5): e97142.
  • 10XU C,NI W F,TIAN NF,e t a l . Compl ic a t ion s i ndegenerat ive lumba r d isease t reated wit h a dynamicinterspinous spacer (Cof lex)[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(11):2199-2204.

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部