期刊文献+

血流储备分数在冠状动脉分叉病变中的应用价值 被引量:4

Application Value of Fraction Flow Reserve in Bifurcation Coronary Artery Lesion
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨心肌血流储备分数(FFR)对冠状动脉分叉病变缺血的预测价值。方法:经冠脉造影(CAG)证实需植入支架的分叉病变患者30例随机分为FFR指导经皮冠脉介入治疗组(FFR-PCI组)及常规CAG后介入治疗组(CAG-PCI组),FFR-PCI组支架植入前后对主支及边支血管行FFR测定,对FFR〈0.75的病例行介入治疗,CAG-PCI组根据造影结果和经验行介入治疗,比较两组支架植入数量,并随访6~9月观察主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。结果:与CAG-PCI组相比,FFR-PCI组的支架植入个数较少,且MACE发生率较低,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:对冠脉分叉病变患者行FFR测定有助于制定合理的手术策略,不仅减少支架植入,而且降低MACE发生率。 Objective : To investigate the application value of fraction flow reserve (FFR) for ische- mia induced by bifurcation coronary artery lesion. Method: Thirty patients with bifurcation lesion, di- agnosed to require stent implantation through coronary angiography, were randomly assigned into FFR- PCI Group and regular CAG-PCI Group. In FFR-PCI group, FFR of both main vessels and side bran- ches were measured before and after the stent implantation, and the intervention treatment was per- formed on patient with FFR less than O. 75 ; in CAG-PCI group, the intervention treatment was per- formed based on coronary angiography; all patients were followed up for 6 to 9 months and major ad- verse cardiovascular event (MACE) was observed. Result: Compared with CAG-PCI group, less stent were implanted into patients of FFR-PCI group, and MACE occurrence rate of FFR-PCI group was sig- nificantly lower then that of CAG-PCI group (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: FFR measured before and after the stent implantation for bifurcation coronary artery lesion can be used to accurately identify and de- sign a reasonable surgical strategy. In this way, the number of stent implanted can be reduced and the MACE incidence rate can be decreased.
出处 《贵阳医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第9期1008-1009,1012,共3页 Journal of Guiyang Medical College
基金 延安大学附院课题(2012YDFY-Y304)
关键词 冠状动脉 分叉病变 血流储备分数 介入治疗 coronary artery bifurcation lesions fraction flow reserve intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Sukhija R,Mehta JL,Sachdeva R.Present status of coronary bifurcation stenting[J].Clin Cardiol,2008(31):63-66.
  • 2Latib A,Colombo A,Sangiorgi G.Bifurcation stenting:current strategies and new devices[J].Heart,2009(95):495-504.
  • 3Latib A,Colombo A.Bifurcation disease:what do we know,what should we do[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2008(3):218-226.
  • 4纪军,何胜虎,徐日新,刘晓东,陈述,谢勇,汪华玲,廖清池.高敏C反应蛋白结合压力导丝在临界冠脉病变介入治疗中的应用效果评价[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(21):12-15. 被引量:2
  • 5Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention[J].N Engl J Med,2009(3):213-224.
  • 6Hamilos M,Peace A,Kochiadakis G,et a1.Fractional Flow Reserve:An indispensable iagnostic tool in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory[J].Hellenic J Cardiol,2010(2):133-141.
  • 7祁小龙,范国鑫,于泓,杨长青.冠状动脉血流储备分数测定技术研究进展[J].中国实用内科杂志,2014,34(1):86-88. 被引量:5

二级参考文献16

  • 1Stone G W, Ellis S G,Cox D A, et al. One-year clinical re-sults with the slow-release. Polymer-based, paclitaxel-elutingTAXUS .stent : the TAXUS-IV trial[J]. Circulation, 2004,109: 1942.
  • 2Falk E, Shah P K, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption[J]. Circulation, 1995, 92: 657.
  • 3Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F,et al. Intravascular ultra-sound criteria for the assessment of the functional significanceof intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison withfractional flow reserve [J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2001, 87: 1.36.
  • 4Glaser R, Selzer F, Faxon DP, et al. Clinical progression ofincidental, asymptomatic lesions discovered during culpritvessel coronary intervention [ J ]. Circulation, 2005,111 :143.
  • 5Iskander S, Iskaridrian A E. Risk assessment using single-photon emiSvSion computed tomographic technetium-99rn ses-tamibi imaging [J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, Jul, 1998,32(1):57.
  • 6MANGIACAPRA F, DI SERAFINO L, BARBATOL E .The role of fractional flow reserve to guide stent implantation[J]. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2011,59(1) : 39.
  • 7Koolen J J, Pijls N H. Coronary pressure never lies [ J ].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2008,72(2) : 248.
  • 8Pijls N H,van Son J A, Kirkeeide R L, et al. Experimentalbasis of determing maximum coronary,myocardial,and col-lateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessingfunctional stenosis severity before and after percutaneoustransluminal coronary angioplasty[J]. Circulation, 1993,87.4): 1354.
  • 9TONINO P A, DE BRUYNE B, PIJLS N H, et al. Frac-tional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percuta-neous coronary intervention [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2009,360(3): 213.
  • 10GACH 〇,LEGRAND V, BIESSAUX Y, et al. Long-termprc^nostic significance of high-sensitivity C~ reactive proteinbefore and after coronary angioplasty in patients with stableangina pectoris[j] . Am J Cardiol, 2007,99(1): 31.

共引文献5

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部