摘要
骈文名称在清代出现了从"四六"到"骈文"的演进,这种演进结果在民国时期得到定型。伴随着名称演进的是对四六与骈文的辨析。"骈文"取代"四六",辨析四六与骈文,是骈文尊体思想在正名与辨体两方面的体现。骈文发展演变的阶段性与名称的演进相吻合,这为辨析四六与骈文提供了极大的便利。清代、民国文论家主要从三方面来辨析四六与骈文:1)从创作领域来辨析,认为四六局限于世俗应用应酬,而骈文则突破了这个藩篱;2)从行文句式来辨析,认为四六不仅是四六行文,而且全篇对偶,而骈文则相对自由;3)从审美效果来辨析,认为四六"无复作家风韵",而骈文则富有文学色彩。名称的演进与对四六骈文的辨析,明确了骈文文体意识,提升了骈文地位。
The name of parallel prose has evolved from ＂Si Liu＂to＂parallel prose＂in the Qing dynasty and became fixed in the period of the Republic of China.The discrimination of Si Liu and parallel prose goes with the evolution of the name.Parallel prose＇s replacement of＂Si Liu＂and the discrimination between the two is the reflection of the concept of respect for parallel prose as a genre in the aspects of rectification of name and style discrimination.The developing stages of parallel prose are consistent with the evolution of name,which provides great convenience for discriminating Si Liu and parallel prose.Literary theorist in the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China mainly discriminate Si Liu and parallel prose from the following perspectives：firstly,in view of the field of creation,Si Liu is limited to social engagement while parallel prose breaks free of this.Secondly,in view of the sentence pattern of writing,Si Liu is not only written by four or six characters in a sentence,but also it is symmetric,while parallel prose is relatively free.Thirdly,in view of aesthetic effect,Si Liu is unable to express the charm of the writer,while parallel prose is more literary.The evolution of the name and the discrimination of Si Liu and parallel prose confirm parallel prose as a style and enhance its status.
出处
《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2015年第3期99-107,共9页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目"中国古代骈文文论研究"(10XZW0023)
广西高等学校立项科研项目"清代骈文选本研究"(201204LX416)
关键词
骈文
四六
尊体
parallel prose
Si Liu
respectful style
