摘要
对于侵权行为是由多个机关所实施的刑事赔偿案件,实务中虽然都采取一定的侵权责任后置原则来确定赔偿义务机关,但在多大的范围内适用后置原则仍存在一定的争议。采取有限后置原则容易造成各机关相互推诿、程序烦琐等问题。相对而言,完全后置原则更有利于公民求偿,但仍存在内部责任外部化的问题。因此,设立独立的赔偿义务机关才是根本的解决办法。
For criminal compensation cases tort implemented by a number of agencies ,although practice adopted certain tort liability rear principles to determine the organ liable for compensation ,there is still much controversy of rear principle ’ s applicable boundaries .Taking measure of limited rear principle is likely to cause the organs mutual buck passing ,cumbersome procedures and other problems .Relatively speaking ,complete rear principle is more conducive to citizens claims ,but there are still internal responsibility externalizing problems .Therefore, the establishment of an independent compensation organization is the fundamental solution .
出处
《北方民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第3期138-141,共4页
Journal of North Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
国家赔偿
有限后置原则
完全后置原则
赔偿义务机关
State Compensation
Limited Rear Principles
Rear Principle Complete
Compensation Organization
