期刊文献+

吉西他滨联合奈达铂治疗晚期三阴乳腺癌的临床研究 被引量:4

Clinical study on treatment of three negative breast cancer patients at advanced stage using gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究吉西他滨联合奈达铂对晚期三阴乳腺癌的治疗效果。方法收集2010年5月~2012年5月于佛山市第一人民医院就诊的晚期TNBC患者70例,将患者按绝经前后、转移部位以及首发还是复发来进行分组,采用Ridit分析患者的治疗效果,比较患者的疗效差异是否具有统计学意义。采用Kaplan-Meier建立无进展生存期曲线,利用Log-rank检验比较疗效具有统计学意义的患者的无进展生存期是否存在差异。结果比较患者的疗效差异,发现首发组和复发组患者的疗效差异具有统计学意义,置信区间没有存在重合部分。整体比较首发组和复发组患者的无进展生存期差异,发现复发者患者的无进展生存期较首发组短,P=0.049,差异具有统计学意义。结论吉西他滨联合奈达铂对晚期三阴乳腺癌对首发组患者治疗效果明显。 Objective To study the therapeutic effect of the gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin on triple-negativebreast cancer(TNBC) cases at advanced stage. Methods Seventy TNBC patients at advanced stage in Foshan Municipal FIrstPeople’s Hospital were selected from May 2010 to May 2012 and divided into several groups based on pre- and post-menopausal, metastases and initiating lesion or recurrence.The therapeutic effecte were statistically analyzed assistant withRidit.. Progression-free survival(PFS)was established by using Kaplan-Meier. Log-rank was used to test differences of efficacyof progression-free survival of patients. Results The differences of efficcies in cases of initiating group and in the recurrentgroup were statistically significant withour overlapping in confidence intervals. When holistically comparing progression-freesurvivals of cases in initiating groups and the recurrent groups, progression-free survival of cases in initiating group was shorterthan that of the recurrent group showing statistically significant difference(P=0.049). Conclusion The therapeutic effect ofnedaplatin combined with gemcitabine is markedly effective on initiated TNBC cases at advanced stage.
作者 曹硕
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2015年第4期463-465,共3页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 吉西他滨 奈达铂 三阴乳腺癌 Gemcitabine Nedaplatin Triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献86

共引文献111

同被引文献50

  • 1于志勇,于金明,吴泰璜,卓培英,王圣芳,李美,张霞,吕宝玉,刘雁冰.乳腺癌分子生物学特性检测的临床意义[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(7):420-422. 被引量:14
  • 2Kandel MJ, Stadler Z, Masciari S, et al. Basal cytokeratin and epider- mal growth factor receptor expression ale not predictive of BRCA1 mu- tation status in women with triple-negative breast cancers [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2009, 33 (7): 1093-1097.
  • 3Kuo YL, Chen DR, Chang TW. Clinicopahological features of triple-negative breast cancer in Taiwan Residents women [J]. Int J CIin Oncol, 2011, 16 (5): 500-505.
  • 4Patriarca C, Macchi R M, Marschner A K, et al. Epithelial cell adhe- sion molecule expression (CD326) in cancer: a short review[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2012,38(1) : 68-75.
  • 5Abd E1-Maqsoud N M, Abd Ebd EI-Rehim D M. Clinicopathologic im- plications of EpCAM and SOX2 expression in breast cancer [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2014, 14 (1): e1-9.
  • 6Goldhirseh A, Wood WC, Coates AS, el al. Strategies for subtypes- dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus oil the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22 (8): 1736-1747.
  • 7Maier S, Wilbertz T, Braun M, et al. SOX2 amplification is a common event in squamous cell carcinomas of different organ sites [J]. Hum. Pathol, 2011, 42 (8): 1078 - 1088.
  • 8Chen Y, Shi L, Zhang L, et al. The molecular mechanism governing the oncogenic potential of SOX2 in breast cancer[J]. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283 (26): 17969 - 17978.
  • 9Rodriguez-Pinilla S M, Sarrio D, Moreno-Bueno G, et al. SOX2: a possible driver of the basal-like phenotype in sporadic breast cancer [J]. Mod. Pathol., 2007, 20 (4): 474 - 481.
  • 10Lengerke C, Fehm T, Kurth R, et al. Expression of the embryonic stem cell marker SOX2 in early-stage breast carcinoma [J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11: 42.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部