摘要
最高人民法院于2012年颁布了关于《中华人民共和国合同法》的第三份司法解释,以澄清买卖合同中的相关问题。值得关注的是,最高法院在该司法解释中明确指出预约合同可以附带法律责任。这是一个在国内外法学界都具有争议性的议题。本文以比较法为视角审视主要法域相关立法和案例所衍生的诸多问题,进而理解预约合同的复杂性,提出了三层次递进式的"诚实信用"框架理论,并尝试在该框架下明确《合同法》与最新司法解释应该如何互相配合以处理和预约合同相关的法律问题。本文以法经济学方法,深度分析预约合同可能产生的责任的理论基础,提出一种干预主义的路径,以期进一步完善预约合同责任理论。
The PRC Supreme People’s Court issued its third piece of judicial interpretation on the PRC Contract Law in 2012 in order to clarify ambiguities surrounding the sales contract. Among others,the new judicial interpretation tries to explicitly impose a pre-contractual liability,which is a confusingly unsettled but dynamically developing area,not only in China but also abroad. This article is an attempt to understand the connections between the PRC Contract Law and the latest judicial interpretation on pre-contractual liability in a logical fashion by outlining a three-stage good faith framework. However,tensions and confusions as illustrated in cases of some advanced economies show that there is a need to revolutionise this area and in that regard,this article advocates for a new,and more interventionalist approach in determining the liability that could potentially flow from conduct that occurs at the pre-contractual stage.
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
CAS
2015年第1期30-44,共15页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
