期刊文献+

腹腔镜监控肠镜下(LMCP)息肉摘除术对比常规肠镜下息肉切除的随机对照临床研究 被引量:3

Comparing Conventional Colonoscopy Polypectomy Double Endoscopic Studies(LMCP) with Intestinal Polyp Excision: A Randomized Controlled Trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜监控下的肠息肉摘除术(LMCP)治疗效果,比较LMCP肠息肉摘除术对比常规肠镜下息肉切除的临床治疗效果及预后情况。方法:将符合条件的所有手术患者随机分为两组,每组各41例,其中试验组使用腹腔镜监控下结肠镜息肉摘除术,对照组单纯使用肠镜行息肉切除术。所有病人均观察并记录其预后情况。结果:研究共纳入82例病人,男53例,女29例,平均年龄70岁。息肉平均大小为2.0 cm。所有患者术后无并发症。试验组和对照组的第一次通便时间分别为13.2 h和24.5h,统计学具有显著性差异P<0.001,风险比为1.81,95%置信区间为[1.13-3.00]。试验组和对照组的总住院天数分别为4.5天和8.0天,统计学具有显著性差异P<0.001,风险比为4.15,置信区间95%CI为[2.40-7.18]。结论:LMCP术对病人具有显著的获益,可以避免不必要的并发症,手术操作更安全。因此,LMCP是一种安全有效的方法,并且创伤更小,住院周期更短,是息肉切除术首选的方法。 Objective: To evaluate laparoscopic surgery under the supervision of intestinal polyps treatment, comparing double mirror joint(LMCP) intestinal polyp excision contrast clinical outcomes and prognosis of conventional colonoscopy polypectomy.Methods: 822 cases of surgery were randomly divided into two groups, each 411 cases. Patients in the experimental group were under the supervision of the use of laparoscopic colonoscopy polypectomy, while in line control group colonoscopy polypectomy was applied.All patients were observed and their prognosis were recorded. Results: 82 patients, 53 males and 29 females, were with an average age of70 years. The average size of the polyps was 2.0cm. The first test group and the control group catharsis time was 2.7 hours and 24.5hours, with a statistically significant difference P0.001, hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI [1.13-3.00]. Figure 1B shows that the total number of days of hospitalization experimental group and the control group was 4.5 days and 8.0 days, respectively, with a statistically significant difference P0.001, hazard ratio 4.15, 95% CI, confidence interval [2.40-7.18]. Conclusions: Laparoscopic excision of intestinal polyps under surveillance for patients with significant benefits, and these benefits are obvious. Therefore, it is a safe and effective method, less invasive, shorter hospitalization period, and is the preferred method polypectomy.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第10期1858-1861,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 上海市科学技术委员会科研基金项目(13DZ1942800)
关键词 肠息肉 腹腔镜 结肠镜 手术 疗效 预后 Intestinal polyps Laparoscopy Colonoscopy Surgery Efficacy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Hoi-Poh Tee,Crispin Corte,Hamdan Al-Ghamdi,Emilia Prakoso,John Darke,Raman Chettiar,Wassim Rahman,Scott Davison,Sean P Griffin,Warwick S Selby,Arthur J Kaffes.Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(31):3905-3910. 被引量:10
  • 2Yukinaga Yoshida,Koji Matsuda,Kazuki Sumiyama,Yosuke Kawahara,Kai Yoshizawa,Haruya Ishiguro,Hisao Tajiri.A randomized crossover open trial of the adenoma miss rate for narrow band imaging (NBI) versus flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE)[J].International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013(11)
  • 3G. Longcroft-Wheaton,J. Brown,D. Cowlishaw,B. Higgins,P. Bhandari.High-definition vs. standard-definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: results from a randomized trial[J].Endoscopy.2012(10)
  • 4T. Rabenstein,F. Radaelli,O. Zolk.Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis[J].Endoscopy.2012(10)
  • 5Thomas R de Wijkerslooth,Esther M Stoop,Patrick M Bossuyt,Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen,Jan Dees,Kristien M A J Tytgat,Monique E van Leerdam,Paul Fockens,Ernst J Kuipers,Evelien Dekker.Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial[J].Gut.2012(10)
  • 6J. E. East,A. Ignjatovic,N. Suzuki,T. Guenther,P. Bassett,P. P. Tekkis,B. P. Saunders.A randomized, controlled trial of narrow‐band imaging vs high‐definition white light for adenoma detection in patients at high risk of adenomas[J].Colorectal Disease.2012(11)
  • 7Felix W. Leung,Arnaldo Amato,Christian Ell,Shai Friedland,Judith O. Harker,Yu-Hsi Hsieh,Joseph W. Leung,Surinder K. Mann,Silvia Paggi,Jürgen Pohl,Franco Radaelli,Francisco C. Ramirez,Rodelei Siao-Salera,Vittorio Terruzzi.Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2012(3)
  • 8Binu J. Jacob,Rahim Moineddin,Rinku Sutradhar,Nancy N. Baxter,David R. Urbach.Effect of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an instrumental variable analysis[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2012(2)
  • 9Eveline J.A. Rondagh,Mari?lle W.E. Bouwens,Robert G. Riedl,Bjorn Winkens,Rogier de Ridder,Tonya Kaltenbach,Roy M. Soetikno,Ad A.M. Masclee,Silvia Sanduleanu.Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2012(6)
  • 10Andreas Adler,Alireza Aminalai,Jens Aschenbeck,Rolf Drossel,Michael Mayr,Mathias Scheel,Andreas Schr?der,Timur Yenerim,Bertram Wiedenmann,Ulrich Gauger,Stephanie Roll,Thomas R?sch.Latest Generation, Wide-Angle, High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection Rate[J].Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2012(2)

共引文献7

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部