摘要
法学界对于新《民事诉讼法》第122条先行调解规定的理解及实施还存在较大争议。调解之"先行"必须与特定的时间节点相比较才有意义。从体系解释及术语使用规范的角度解读,先行调解是当事人将纠纷起诉至法院之后,在立案之前进行的调解。先行调解的适用条件"适宜调解"强调的是不能违法调解或不应在案情复杂、当事人对抗激烈之类的纠纷上徒劳消耗资源,是否"适宜调解"宜采取个案判断的方法。人民法院既可以通过立案庭或专门机构实施先行调解,也可以将纠纷委派人民调解组织、行政机构,在先行调解中实现三调联动。调解协议只具有普通民事合同的效力,但通过诉调对接,即当事人自愿选择立案签发调解书和启动司法确认程序两种方式,能够赋予调解协议强制执行力。
There is much controversial in the jurisprudential circle about the rule of mediation first in Article 122 of the new Civil Procedure Law. The word ＂first＂ can show its meaning by compared with a specific time. From the perspective of system inter- pretation and the using rule of the terms, mediation first is such kind of mediation which is carried on after the parties file the lawsuit and before the case is registered. The applicable condition ＂suitable for mediation＂ stresses to prohibit illegal mediation or the consumption of mediation resources in vain. We can make the judgment in every single case. The people~ courts can im- plement the mediation first either by the case acceptance tribunals, the specialized agencies and the delegated organization, administrative agencies. The conciliation agreement has the effectiveness just the same as the common civil contract, but the parties can voluntarily entrust the mediation agreement with enforceable effectiveness by making a mediation record or initiating a judicial confirmation process.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期47-52,共6页
Legal Forum
基金
江西省社会科学"十二五"(2013年)规划项目<"调解优先"司法政策研究--以新〈民事诉讼法〉实施为视角>(13FX11)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
先行调解
诉讼调解
诉调对接
mediation first
lawsuit mediation
the mechanism of litigation and mediation connection
