期刊文献+

前列腺癌淋巴结转移的特点及其临床意义 被引量:15

Characters of lymphatic metastasis and their significance in radical prostatectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨前列腺癌淋巴结转移的规律及其临床意义。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2014年1月收治的103例前列腺癌患者的临床病理资料。年龄49~77岁,平均65岁。术前PSA值3.7~52.0μg/L,平均14.7斗g/L。术前活检Gleason评分5~10分,平均7分。危险因素分级低、中、高危组分别为44、31、28例。103例均行根治性前列腺切除+扩大分区盆腔淋巴结清扫术。将盆腔淋巴结按解剖部位分为5组9区:髂外组、髂总组、闭孔组、髂内组,每组左、右侧各为1区;骶前组为1区。比较各组切除的淋巴结数目、转移率、转移密度及分布情况。结果本组103例,共切除淋巴结2136枚,每例切除淋巴结13~37枚,平均21枚。22例(21%)发生淋巴结转移。低、中、高危组的转移率分别为2%(1/44)、26%(8/31)、46%(13/28),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。各组淋巴结转移率由高到低分别为髂内组59%(13/22)、闭孔组50%(11/22)、髂外组36%(8/22)、骶前组14%(3/22)、髂总组5%(1/22),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。转移密度由高到低排列为闭孔组37%(19/53)、骶前组33%(3/9)、髂内组28%(21/74)、髂外组25%(8/32)、髂总组,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论行根治性前列腺切除术时,对低危患者可不实施扩大分区盆腔淋巴结清扫,中高危者必须行淋巴结清扫;对淋巴结转移率及转移密度均较高的闭孔、髂内和髂外区域必须清扫;术中对骶前区域要重点检查,如发现可疑淋巴结要完整清扫;髂总区域不必常规清扫。 Objective To evaluate the features about metastasis of different pelvic lymph node groups and their significance in radical prostatectomy. Methods From January 2004 to January 2014, the data of 103 patients with prostate cancer, who accepted the radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (e-PLND) , were analyzed, retrospectively. The mean age was 64.9 years old (range 49-77 years) and the mean preoperative PSA level was 14.7μg/L (range 3.7-52.0 μg/L). The Gleason scores ranged from 5 to 10 scores (mean 6.9 scores). Risk group assessment showed low risk in 44 cases, intermediate risk in 31 cases and high risk in 28 cases. The pelvic lymph nodes were divided into 9 regions and 5 groups according to the common guideline, including the external iliac, internal iliac, obturator and common iliac lymph nodes bilaterally, and the presacral lymph nodes. The frequency and density of pelvic lymphatic nodes metastasis in these patients were compared. Results Complete pathological information was available for 103 patients. Totally, 2 136 lymph nodes were dissected. The numbers of dissected lymphatic nodes in each patients ranged from 13 to 37 (mean 21 ). Among them, 22 patients were found the evidence of lymphatic node metastasis, including 2% (1/44) with low risk group, 26% ( 8/31 ) with intermediate risk group and 46% (13/28) in high risk group (P〈 0.05). The metastatic total rate and degree of dissected lymph nodes were 21%. The metastatic frequency of lymph node groups in these patients from higher to Lower were as follows: 59% (13/22) in internal iliac region, 50% (11/22) in obturator region, 36% (8/22) in external iliac region, 14% (3/22) in presacral region and 5% (1/22) in common iliac region, with a statistically significant difference in those groups (P〈0.05). The metastatie density of the lymph node groups from higher to lower were demonstrated as follows: 37% (19/53) in obturator region,33% (3/9) in presaoral region, 28% (21/74) in internal iliac region, 25% (8/32) in external iliae region and 20% (1/5) in common iliae region, with no statistically signifieant difference in those groups (P〉0.05). Conclusions In radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer, it is not necessary to perform e-PLND in the low-risk group. It is suggested that the' regional lymph nodes with intermediate- and high-risk group should be resected necessarily. Our study also suggested that the regional lymph nodes, including obturator, internal iliac and external iliac nodes, should be resected eompletely, due to the high metastatic rate and density. The presaeral region should be the key to be checked, while regular disseetion in eommon iliac region is not necessary.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期829-832,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 根治性前列腺切除 淋巴结转移 淋巴结切除术 Postate neoplasms Radical prostateetomy Lymphatic metastasis Lymph node excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Virani N, et al. Gleason score 7 ade- noearcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostateetmny specimens [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013, 137: 610-617.
  • 2Chen MK, Luo Y, Zhang H, et al. Laparoseopie radical prosta- teetmny plus extended lymph nodes disseetion for eases with non- extra node metastatic prostate eaneer: 5-year experience in a sin- gle Chinese institution [ J]. J Caneer Res Clin Oneol,2013,139: 871-878.
  • 3Tollefsn MK, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ, et al. The impact of clini- cal stage on prostate cancer survival following radical prostatecto- my []]. J Urol, 2013, 189: 1707-1712.
  • 4Osmonov K, Boller A, Aksenov A, et al. Intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients. Clinical significance of extended lymphadcnectomy [J]. Urologe A, 2013, 52: 240-245.
  • 5Abdollah F, Suardi N, Gallina A, et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center [J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24: 1459-1466.
  • 6La Rochelle JC, Amlin$ CL. Role of Lymphadenectomy for pros- tate cancer: indications and controversies [ J]. Urol Clin Noah Am, 2011, 38: 387-395.
  • 7Godoy G, Chong KT, Cronin A, et al. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement [ J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60: 195-199.
  • 8Heidenreich A, Varga Z, yon Knobloch R. Extended pelvic Iymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy:high incidence of lymph nodes metastasis [ J ]. J Uro|, 2002, 167: 1681-1686.
  • 9那彦群,孙颖浩.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等,2014版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:61-89.
  • 10Godoy G, van Badman C, Chade DC, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency and distribution of nodal metastases in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series [ J ]. J Urol, 2012, 187: 2082-2086.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Heidenreich A,Bastian P J,Bellmunt J,et al.Guidelines on prostate cancer.Uroweb 2013.http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/09_Prostate_C ancer_LR.pdf.
  • 2Makarov DV,Trock BJ,Humphreys EB,et al.Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level,clinical stage,and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables)based on cases from 2000 to 2005.Urology,2007,69:1095-1101.
  • 3Crawford ED,Batuello JT,Snow P,et al.The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.Cancer,2000,88:2105-2109.
  • 4Bhatta-Dhar N,Reuther AM,Zippe C,et al.No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.Urology,2004,63:528-531.
  • 5Briganti A,Larcher A,Abdollah F,et al.Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection:the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.Eur Urol,2012,61:480-487.
  • 6Schumacher MC,Burkhard FC,Thalmann GN,et al.Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with a serum PSA <10 ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?.Eur Urol,2006,50:272-279.
  • 7Kazzazi A,Djavan B.Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer:the New York PLND nomogram.Can J Urol,2011,18:5585-5591.
  • 8Briganti A,Blute ML,Eastham JH,et al.Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.Eur Urol,2009,55:1251-1265.
  • 9Briganti A,Karnes JR,Da Pozzo LF,et al.Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer.A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy,extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy.Eur Urol, 2009, 55:261-270.
  • 10Touijer K,Fuenzalida RP,Rabbani F,et al.Extending the indications and anatomical limits of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer:improved staging or increased morbidity?.BJU Int,2011,108:372-377.

共引文献6

同被引文献75

  • 1高新,邱剑光,蔡育彬,周祥福,温星桥.控尿技术在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):176-179. 被引量:29
  • 2Garcia F J, Violette PD, Brock GB, et al. Predictive factors for return of erectile function in robotic radical prostatectomy : case series from a single centre [J]. Int J Impot Res, 2015, 27 ( 1 ) : 29-32.
  • 3Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the 'Veil of Aphrodite' technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing [J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49 ( 6 ) : 1065-1073.
  • 4WalzJ, BurnettAL, CostelloAJ, etal. Acriticalanalysisofthe current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 57 ( 2 ) : 179-192.
  • 5Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Hinata N, et al. Histological evaluation of nerve sparing technique in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Indian J Urol, 2014, 30 ( 3 ) : 268-272.
  • 6Miyake H, Behnsawy HM, Hinata N, et al. Objective assessment of residual nerve tissues in radical pmstatectomy specimens by immunohistochemical staining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase- positive nerves and its impact on postoperative erectile function [J]. Urology, 2014, 84 ( 6 ) : 1395-1401.
  • 7Sung W, Lee S, Park YK, et al. Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2010, 25 ( 5 ) : 608-612.
  • 8Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study [J]. Urology, 2005, 66(6 ) : 1261-1265.
  • 9Nyarangi-Dix JN, Radtke JP, Hadaschik B, et al. Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary continence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled, single blind trial [J]. J Urol, 2013,189 ( 3 ) : 891-898.
  • 10Barr C, Thoulouzan M, Aillet G, et al. Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors [J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114 ( 4 ) : 522-531.

引证文献15

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部