摘要
配偶权是一种对物性的对人权,具有对抗不特定第三人的效力,其受侵权责任法的保护并无理论上的障碍。各国或地区的司法实践之所以对此做法不一,实际上是其立法政策考量的结果。尽管我国2001年的"婚姻法修正案"增设了离婚损害赔偿制度,但无过错配偶方并不能依此规定请求有过错并导致其婚姻破裂的第三者承担侵权责任,受害方不能得到有效救济。配偶权受侵权责任法保护的价值所在,在于其在保护婚姻自由的同时实现社会正义,并对离婚破裂主义所带来的弊端进行矫正。在完善我国有关立法时,应考量我国的伦理道德因素、社会因素及其他因素,有条件地承认侵犯配偶权的行为受侵权责任法的调整。
The spousal fights are a kind of rights in personem with erga omnes features, which means it has the legal effect of being invoked against unspecified third parties. Thus there is no legal difficulty in deferring to the legal pro- tection of tort law. Although the judicial practices in various countries or regions differ with each other, it has main- ly been due to the various policy considerations manifested in legislative process in those jurisdictions. In China＇ s 2001 Revision to the Marriage Act, the system of divorcing damages was established. However, the spouse without any fault still cannot demand for damages from the faulty third person causing the breakup of his/her marriage, thus depriving the victims of any effective legal remedies. Therefore, there is certain value in the tort law protection of the spousal rights. It lies in the combination of goals of protection of freedom of marriage and realization of social justice, as well as remedying the imperfections implicit in the doctrine of breakup effect of divorces. To further im- prove Chinese relevant legislations by taking into consideration various ethical, moral, social, and other elements, we need to recognize with certain conditions attached that the acts in violation of the spousal rights failing into the scope of tort law.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期85-96,共12页
Law Review
关键词
亲属身份权
配偶权
对物性的对人权
侵权责任法
Relatives＇ Rights
Spousal Rights
Rights in personem with erga omnes feature
Tort Law
