期刊文献+

“项目制”的运作机制和效果是“合理化”吗? 被引量:245

“Governance by Project Grants”:Do Its Operative Mechanisms and Results Amount to“Rationalization”?
原文传递
导出
摘要 最近几年一组优秀的中国社会学学者率先争论,中国社会和治理的关键机制已经从之前的"单位制"转化为"项目制"。他们大多认为,这个治理"转型"代表的是现代化和合理化,包括专业化和技术化,是从"管制型"到"服务型"治理的演变。本文论证,在实际运作中,"项目制"所遵循的其实是另一套逻辑,是逐利价值观下所形成的权—钱结合,主要展示为"官商勾结"。这个机制一定程度上推动了中国的经济发展,但也促使社会越来越不公平,并已初步凝固为一种坚韧的治理体制,亟需警惕和改革。 A group of fine Chinese sociologists have led in arguing that China's'unit system'has given way to a'project grants'system as the key to Chinese governance(and social organization). Most of them see this change as a'transition'to modernized,rational governance,including increased specialization and greater reliance on modern technology,amounting to a change from a'control-'to a'service-'oriented government. This article seeks to demonstrate that,in practice,the'project grants'system of governance has obeyed instead the logic of pursuing gain and has led to a tight alliance between power and money,official and merchant. It is a mechanism that has to some extent driven economic development,but has engendered greater and greater social inequality. It is in danger of solidifying into a permanent system — one that cries out for vigilant criticism and reform.
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期143-159,8,共17页 Open Times
关键词 推广双季稻 农业合作社 土地财政 权-钱结合 重庆实验 double-cropping of rice,agricultural cooperatives,land financing,the power-money alliance,the Chongqing experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

二级参考文献415

共引文献7526

同被引文献2929

二级引证文献4291

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部