期刊文献+

3D咬合板的临床应用与精确性评价 被引量:4

Assessment of the reliability and accuracy of 3D occlusal splints
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:以传统咬合板为参照,评价3D咬合板的临床可靠性;通过手术前、后三维头影测量,评价3D咬合板的精确性。方法:选择颅颌面畸形患者15例,术前制作传统咬合板,使用Mimics 10.01软件在锥形束CT(CBCT)重建三维模型上进行虚拟手术及3D咬合板设计,并由Objet Eden260VTM 3D Printer打印3D咬合板。术中先后使用3D咬合板和传统咬合板,统计3D咬合板的成功率。术后1周复查CBCT,进行三维头影测量。手术前、后分别进行3次重复定点测量,使用SPSS13.0软件包和MedCalc13.1.2软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果:15例3D咬合板的成功率为100%,三维头影测量的24个线距测量值和24个面角测量值在虚拟手术与实际手术间无显著差异(P>0.05)。线距测量值具有良好的一致性,角度测量值一致性欠佳。结论:3D咬合板具有一定的临床适用性,但其精确性有待提高。 PURPOSE: To estimate the reliability of 3D occlusal splints compared with traditional occlusal splints, and to evaluate the accuracy of 3D occlusal splints through 3D cephalometry. METHODS: Fifteen patients with maxillofacial deformity were involved in this experiment. Traditional occlusal splints were made pre-operatively, and virtual surgery was performed on 3D maxillofacial model. Then 3D occlusal splints were printed by Objet Eden260VTM3 D Printer. During the actual surgery, both splints were used to check the fitness of 3D occlusal splints. Cone-beam CT was taken 1 week after surgery. 3D cephalometry was repeated 3 times for both virtual and actual surgery. SPSS13.0 software package and MedCalc13.1.2 software were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the 3D occlusal splints were successfully used in the surgery, and no significant difference was found between virtual surgery and actual surgery(P 〉0.05). Good consistency was obtained in distances rather than in angles. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional occlusal splints were qualified clinically with the accuracy to be improved in future.
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期311-317,共7页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81070818) 广东省科技计划项目(2011B061300051)~~
关键词 正颌外科 3D咬合板 三维头影测量 精确性 Orthognathic surgery Three-dimensional occlusal splint Three-dimensional cephalometry Accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tonaography imaging in orthodontics [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011, 40(1): 24-34.
  • 2Tucker S, Cevidanes LH, Styner M, et al. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(10): 2412-2421.
  • 3Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schwarz U, et al. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional primer [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2008,105(2): e1-7.
  • 4Goiato MC, Santos MR, Pesqueira AA, et al. Prototyping for surgical and prosthetic treatment[J]. J Craniofac Surg,2011,22(3): 914-917.
  • 5Hassan B, van der Steh P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three- dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position [J]. Eur J Orthod,2009,31 (2): 129-134.
  • 6Titiz I, Laubinger M, Keller T, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks-a three-dimensional computed tomography study [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2012, 34(3): 276-286.
  • 7Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, et al. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(3): 312.e1-10.
  • 8Olmez H, Gorgulu S, Akin E, et al. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method [J]. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81 (3): 375- 382.
  • 9Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. Effect of facial asymmetry on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Sur, 2011, 69(3): 655-662.
  • 10张晓芸,许天民.应用锥束计算机体层摄影术评价颅颌面的不对称[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2013,45(1):156-161. 被引量:2

二级参考文献30

  • 1叶强,穆雄铮,徐海淞,俞哲元,张如鸿,杨娴娴,高晓燕.面部不对称畸形三维重建影像部分骨性标志点三维定位标准的建立[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2006,2(3):140-144. 被引量:12
  • 2Farman AG,Scarfe WC. The basics of maxillofacial cone beam computer tomography[J].Seminars in Orthodontics,2009,(01):2-13.doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2008.09.001.
  • 3Major P,Johnson D,Hesse K. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification[J].Angle Orthodontist,1996,(01):51-60.
  • 4Cook JT. Asymmetry of the cranio-facial skeleton[J].British Journal of Orthodontics,1980,(01):33-38.
  • 5Hassan B,Van der Stelt P,Sanderrink G. Accuracy of three-dimesional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis:influence of patient scanning position[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2008,(02):129-134.
  • 6Hwang HS,Hwang CH,Lee KH. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2006,(06):779-785.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021.
  • 7Berco M,Rigali PH Jr,Miner RM. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2009,(01):17.el-17.17.
  • 8Hilgers ML,Scarfe WC,Scheetz JP. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2005,(06):803-811.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034.
  • 9Ludlow JB,Laster WS,See M. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images[J].Oral Surgery,Oral Medicine,Oral Pathology,Oral Radiology & Endodontics,2007,(04):534-542.
  • 10Pinsky HM,Dyda S,Pinsky RW. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using conebeam CT[J].Dentomaxillofacial Radiology,2006,(04):410-416.

共引文献22

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部