期刊文献+

人工椎间盘置换术治疗跳跃型多节段颈椎病的中期疗效 被引量:14

Comparison of the mid-term follow-up results between treatment of Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement and ante- rior cervical decompression and fusion for "skip" cervical spondylosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Bryan人工间盘置换术治疗跳跃型多节段颈椎病的疗效。方法回顾性分析2002年2月至2012年5月接受Bryan间盘置换术(Bryan组)或颈前路减压植骨融合术(ACDF组)治疗的跳跃型多节段颈椎病患者相关资料。临床功能评估采用日本矫形外科协会(Japanese orthopaedic association,JOA)评分、颈椎功能障碍指数neck disabilityindex,NDI)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visualanal ogucscale,VAS),影像学评估采用颈椎矢状位曲度、颈椎整体活动度及中间节段活动度,并于末次随访时评估邻近节段退变情况。结果49例患者随访超过24个月,Bryan组18例,ACDF组31例。两组患者性别、年龄、疾病类型等人口学资料的差异无统计学意义。两组患者术后JOA、NDI、VAS评分均较术前有明显改善。两组间各时间节点比较仅末次随访时VAS评分的差异有统计学意义。Bryan组术后轴性症状发生率、颈椎活动度和未手术节段活动度分别为11.1%、35.5^。±5.9^。和7.3^。±1.4^。,ACDF组分别为45.2%、24.5^。±6.2^。、10.1^。±1.6^。,差异均有统计学意义。Bryan组患者邻近节段无明显退变,ACDF组2例出现退变,但无需再次手术。结论应用Bryan间盘置换术治疗跳跃型多节段颈椎病,可有效改善神经功能,保留颈椎整体活动度,减少未手术节段活动度的代偿性增加,从而降低邻近节段退变及轴性症状发生率。 Objective To retrospectively analysis and compareabout Bryan artificial cervical disc arthroplasty with ante- rior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the clinical efficacy for "Skip" cervical spondylosis. Methods From February 2002 to May 2012, 49 cases were treated with Bryan artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (artificial cervical disc replacement surgery group, 18 cases) or anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF group, 31 cases), 29 males and 20 females. Each case was evaluated at the moment of preoperatively, 3 months, 6 and 12 months and last follow-up after surgery by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Cervical sagittal curvature, the total cervical spine range of motion (ROM), middle segments of motion. MRI was also used to assess to adjacent segment disc degeneration, spinal cord compression and signal change situation. Results All patients were followed up for more than 24 months. The score of the JOA, NDI, VAS in the two groups of patients improved significantly after surgery than before surgery. In addition, the VAS score in last follow-up were significantly different between the two groups, but other index each time in the two groups showed no significant difference. In last follow-up, the result of artificial cervical disc arthroplasty group were better than ACDF group on the incidence of axial symptoms, the total cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and middle segments of motion. The incidence of axial symptoms in artificial cervical disc arthroplasty group were 11.1%, ACDF group were 45.2%. ROM in arti- ficial cervical disc arthroplasty group were 35.500±5.90, ACDF group were 24.50ο±6.2ο. Middle segments of motion in artificial cer- vical disc arthroplasty group were 7.3ο±1.4ο, ACDF group were 10.1ο±1.6ο. The above comparison of the datas were statistically different. There are two cases of adjacent segment degeneration in ACDF group without need to surgery. Conclusion Bryan artifi- cial cervical disc replacement surgery effectively retained the overall motion of the cervical spine, reduced the motion of middle segments, thus avoiding adjacent segment degeneration and the incidence of postoperative axial symptoms.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期791-798,共8页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 颈椎 脊髓压迫症 全椎间盘置换 脊柱融合术 Cervical vertebrae Spinal cord compression Total disc replacement Spinal Fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and inter- body fusion [ J ], J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1958, 40(3) : 607-624.
  • 2Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous ante- rior cervical arthrodesis [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81(4): 519-528.
  • 3任虎,申勇,于绍斌,王林峰,曹俊明,李志远,侯英诺,刘法敬.脊髓型颈椎病肌电图检测结果与临床术后评估的相关性分析[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2010,32(5):375-377. 被引量:4
  • 4Xu JX, Zhang YZ, Shen Y, et al. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(10): 1012-1017.
  • 5雷涛,申勇,王林峰,丁文元,张为,张迪.节段型严重颈椎后纵韧带骨化症前路、后路手术的疗效比较与选择策略[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(2):117-122. 被引量:28
  • 6Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Associa- tion Cervical Myelopatby Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1 [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2007, 12(3): 227-240.
  • 7Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliabili- ty and validity[J]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991, 14(7): 409- 41.
  • 8曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路术后融合节段曲度变化与轴性症状和神经功能的相关性研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(9):520-523. 被引量:107
  • 9Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow K, et al. The effect of cervical plating on single- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [J]. J Spinal Disord, 1999, 12(6): 467-471.
  • 10Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of ad- jacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 3(6): 417-423.

二级参考文献84

共引文献216

同被引文献140

  • 1张睿,周文钰,顾洪生,刘伟强,白波,王大平.颈椎单节段融合术后相邻各节段运动补偿的规律研究[J].中国临床实用医学,2014,5(1). 被引量:4
  • 2刘洪智,李明,汤继文,刘培来,左振柏,李振峰,张元凯,李德强.神经根型颈椎病的前路手术治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(9):653-655. 被引量:15
  • 3王会民,刘海鹰,张健.应用Solis融合器治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(13):972-974. 被引量:5
  • 4周建伟,蒋振亚,叶锐彬,李先樑,袁秀丽,张凡,李常度,李刚,唐启华,胡运光,艾双春,陈婕,李春雨,廖伟,王琼芬,罗小兵,赵菁菁,李安洪,孔捷,秦雪飞,欧阳松,罗建平,王敏,阳光,李金存,王芳,古英,高李.针灸推拿为主治疗神经根型颈椎病:多中心随机对照研究[J].中国针灸,2006,26(8):537-543. 被引量:63
  • 5王少波,王圣林.颈椎前路手术后吞咽困难的原因分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(12):913-916. 被引量:16
  • 6Singh K.Vaecaro AR.Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy:a biomeehaniealstudy[J]. Spine,2014,29(8):845-849.
  • 7Ashkenazi E,Smorgick Y,Rand N,et al.Anterior de-compression combined with corpectomies and discee-tomies in the management of multilevel cervicalmyelopathy:a hybrid decompression and fixationtechnique[J].J Neurosurgery Spine,2005,3(3):205-209.
  • 8Singh K,Vaccaro AR,Kim J,et al.Enhancement ofstability following anterior cervical corpectomy:abiomechanicalstudy[J]. Spine,2004,29(8):845-849.
  • 9Bolesta MJ,Rechtine GR 2nd,Chrin AM.One and two level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:the effect of platefixation[J]. Spine,2002,2(3):197-203.
  • 10Samartzis D,Shen FH,Goldberg EJ,et al.Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2005 Aug 1,30(15):1756-61.

引证文献14

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部