期刊文献+

躯体形式障碍患者的执行功能及Go/NoGo任务下的事件相关电位 被引量:2

The Go/no-go Task by Event-related Potential on Executive Function in Somatoform Disorders
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨躯体形式障碍患者的执行功能及Go/NoGo任务下的事件相关电位特征。方法共随机选取年龄在18~65岁之间符合美国《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-4)诊断标准的患者30例作为研究组,同时选择年龄、性别、受教育年限与研究组相匹配的30例健康者作为对照组。两组受试者均予以威斯康星卡片测验( WCST )及Go/NoGo范式的事件相关电位( ERPs)检测,并将结果加以分析。结果两组之间比较,研究组各电极位点的P3波幅均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.32~8.01,P<0.01或<0.05);研究组WCST测验的正确应答数及概念化水平百分数项目的分值低于对照组,而错误应答数、选择错误率(%),持续性错误数及持续性错误的百分数项目的分值均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.27~4.77,P<0.05或<0.01);两组之间的其余WCST项目评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.48~1.55,P>0.05)。结论躯体形式障碍患者存在执行功能障碍。 Objective To investigate the traits of executive function and the event -related potential in go/no-go task in somatoform disorders.Methods 30 patients(among 18~60 years old) meeting with DSM-4 for somatoform disorders criteria were recruited as research group .30 marched sexual and age healthy adolescents were selected as normal control group .Go/no-go task by event -related potential and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test were recorded with all the subjects .Results Regarding the go/no-go task by ERPs, comparing with the control group,the amplitudes of the research group were significantly lower (t=2.32~8.01,P〈0.01 or 〈0.05). Regarding the WCST test ,comparing with the control group ,the research group showed a decrease in the ack number and the percentage of conceptual level ,and a increase in the error response number and the select error rate ,the error selection number and the error selection percentage (t=2.27~4.77,P〈0.01 or 〈0.05).The both group were not different in other WCST test'scores(t=0.48~1.55,P〉0.05).Conclusion Patients with somatoform disorders have executive dysfunction .
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第9期1285-1287,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 躯体形式障碍 事件相关电位 GO NoGo任务 执行功能 Somatoform disorders Event-related potential Go/no-go task Executive function
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Godemann F, Schabowska A, Naetebusch B, et al. The impact of cogni- tions on the development of panic and somatoform disorders: A pro- spective study in patients with vestibular neuritis [ J ]. Psychol Med, 2006,36:99-108.
  • 2Lim S L, Kim J H. Cognitive processing of emotional information in de- pression, panic, and somatoform disorder[ J ]. J Abnorm Psychol,2005, 114:50-61.
  • 3Hall N M, Kuzminskyte R, pedersen A D, et al. The relationship be- tween cognitive functions, somatization and behavioural coping in pa- tients with multiplefunctional somatic symptoms [ J ]. Nord J Psychia- try,2011,65 ( 3 ) :216-224.
  • 4Al - Adawi S, Al - Zakwani I, Obeid Y A, et al. Neurocognitive func- tioning in women presenting with undifferentiated somatoform disorders in Oman [ J ]. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2010,64 ( 5 ) :555-564.
  • 5杨硕,王苏弘,任艳玲,王单单,杨志龙,蔡婧,马岭,高鹏,董选.大学生静息功能磁共振比率低频振幅信号与Go/Nogo任务表现的相关研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2012,21(12):1109-1111. 被引量:5
  • 6Levander H. Sensory sensitization, part I : Mechanisms behind fibromy- algia. "So mywife 's pain system has become unnecessarily efficient" [ J]. Lakartidningen,2003,100( 18 ) : 1608-1609,1612-1617.
  • 7Shintato F. Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex[ J] . Neuroscience Research,2001,39 : 147-165.
  • 8Stefan K, Joerg U, Markus K, et al. Executive control deficit in depres- sion:Event -related potentials in a Goy Nogo task[ J]. Psychiatry Re- search : Neuroimaging,2003,122 : 169-184.
  • 9闾金杰,杨永杰,李海玲,刘艳,王亚萍,叶育宏,徐冬梅,冯宝珍,刘玲.无抽搐电休克治疗对精神分裂症患者执行功能的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2013,21(10):1443-1445. 被引量:26
  • 10吴明飞,蒋巧,李瑞,王芳.结构式家庭治疗对注意缺陷多动障碍儿童行为与执行功能的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(9):1353-1355. 被引量:8

二级参考文献38

  • 1朱春燕,汪凯,Lee TMC.执行功能与精神分裂症[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):743-751. 被引量:25
  • 2宋志文,蔡理荣,李耀东,黄能达.无抽搐电休克治疗对抑郁症的疗效及记忆影响的研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2005,5(6):424-426. 被引量:26
  • 3安宝富,李晏,王长虹.奥氮平对精神分裂症患者执行功能障碍的影响[J].临床精神医学杂志,2006,16(3):144-145. 被引量:6
  • 4Gail Tripp E A,Schaughency. Family interactions in children with and without ADHD[J]. J Child Faro Stud, 2007,16 : 385-400.
  • 5emrud C M,Steingard R J,Filipek P,et al. Using MRI to examine brain--behavior relationships in males with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity[J]. J Am Acad Chlild Adolesc Psychiatry, 2000, 39(4) :477-484.
  • 6Barkley R A. Defiant children: A clinician's manual for assessment and parent training[M]. 2nd ed. New York:Guilford Press, 1997:1- 14.
  • 7Reeve W V, Schandler S L. Frontal lobe functioning in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Adolescence, 2001, 36(144) : 749-765.
  • 8Mennes M, Zuo XN, Kelly C, et al. Linking inter-individual differ- ences in neural activation and behavior to intrinsic brain dynamics. Neuroimage, 2011,54 : 2950-2959.
  • 9Zuo XN, Di Martino A, Kelly C, et al. The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage,2010,49 : 1432-1445.
  • 10Stuss DT, Murphy K J, Binns MA, et al. Staying on the job : the frontal lobes control individual perfomaance variability. Brain, 2003, 126 : 2363-2380.

共引文献35

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部