期刊文献+

良恶性骨肿瘤的MRI鉴别诊断 被引量:19

The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant bone tumors
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的通过MRI表现与病理学的对照研究,寻找良恶性骨肿瘤的MRI鉴别诊断征象。材料与方法回顾手术病理证实典型的良恶性骨肿瘤156例,其中良恶性骨肿瘤各78例,(已剔除良恶性交界性肿瘤或侵袭性肿瘤,如韧带样纤维瘤、骨巨细胞瘤等),进行MRI征象及病理学对照,找出良恶性骨肿瘤的鉴别点。全部病例平扫采用包括T1WI、T2WI、T2WI脂肪抑制序列、扩散成像(DWI)。81例行增强扫描采用T1WI。对各种征象在良恶性骨肿瘤中的出现率做统计学分析。结果骨骼为中心的软组织肿块98.5%(64/65)为恶性,1.5%(1/65)为良性,两者有显著性差别(u=2.98,P<0.01)。肿瘤边界清楚者47.6%(39/82)为恶性,52.4%(43/82)为良性,两者无显著性差别(u=1.45,P>0.05)。DWI高信号者,51.6%(65/126)出现于恶性骨肿瘤,48.4%(61/126)出现于良性骨肿瘤,两者无显著性差别(u=1.27,P>0.05)。有肿瘤周围水肿者66.7%(60/90)为恶性,33.3%(30/90)为良性,两者有显著性差异(u=2.65,P<0.05)。出现放射状骨膜反应与骨膜三角者93.8%(45/48)为恶性,6.2%(3/48)为良性,两者有显著性差异(u=2.83,P<0.01)。病变区域明显强化者,71.0%(49/69)出现于恶性骨肿瘤,29.0%(20/69)出现于良性骨肿瘤,两者有显著性差别(u=2.33,P<0.05)。结论骨内病变周围软组织肿块是恶性骨肿瘤的可靠征象。放射状骨膜反应与骨膜三角强烈提示恶性骨肿瘤,少数情况下也可见于良性肿瘤。异常信号边界清楚与否、病变周围水肿、DWI高信号对骨肿瘤良恶性鉴别意义不大。病变区域明显强化者,以恶性骨肿瘤居多。 Objective:To ifnd out the speciifc signs of differential diagnosis between benign and malignant bone tumors by comparing study of MR and pathology. Materials and Methods:Review 156 cases of bone tumors that are proved by surgical procedure and pathology, which include 78 cases of benign and malignant bone tumors respectively (borderline and aggressive tumors like giant cell tumor and desmoplastic ifbroma are excluded from the study). The MRI signs were compared with pathological results, the different points between malignant and benign tumors were detected. All the 156 cases were performed MR plain scan using T1WI, T2WI, T2WI with fat suppression and DWI sequences. 81 cases were performed MR enhanced scan using T1WI. The occurrence rates of all the signs in benign and malignant bone tumors are analyzed statistically. Results:Abnormal signals inside bone together with solid soft tissue mass around, 98.5%(64/65) were found in malignant bone tumors, 1.5%(1/65) were found in benign bone tumors, the difference between the two was obvious (u=2.98, P〈0.01). Lesions with clear margin, 47.6%(39/82) were malignant, 52.4% (43/82) were benign, there was no demonstrated difference between the two (u=1.45, P〉0.05). DWI high signal 51.6%(65/126) was found in the malignant, 48.4%(61/126) in the benign, there was no signiifcant difference between the two (u=1.27, P〉0.05). Edema around the tumor, 66.7%(60/90) appeared in the malignant, 33.3%(30/90) appeared in the benign, the difference between the two was obvious (u=2.65, P〈0.05). Radial periosteal reaction and Codman triangle:93.8%(45/48) were displayed in malignant, 6.2%(3/48) were shown in benign bone tumors, the difference between the two was obvious (u=2.83, P〈0.01). Remarkable enhancement 71.0%(49/69) demonstrated in the malignant, 29.0%(20/69) in the benign, signiifcant difference existed between the two (u=2.33, P〈0.05). Conclusions:The reliable sign of malignant bone tumors is the abnormal signal inside the bone combined with solid soft tissue mass around the bone. Radial periosteal reaction and Codman triangle strongly suggest malignant, and can rarely be seen in benign lesions. Clear margin, DWI high signal and edema have no remarkable value to differentiate the benign and malignant bone tumors. Most of the bone tumors with marked enhancement are malignant.
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS CSCD 2014年第4期291-295,共5页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 山东省科技发展计划基金(编号:2011YD18021)
关键词 骨肿瘤 磁共振成像 诊断 鉴别 Bone neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Diagnosis,differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Rajiah P, llaslan H, Sundaram M. Imaging of primary malignant bone tumors (nonhematological). Radiol Clin North Am, 2011, 49(6): 1135-1161.
  • 2Boulet B, Caramella C, Couanet D, et al. MR imaging patterns of bone marrow. J Radiol, 2010, 91(9): 935-949.
  • 3Hwang S. Imaging of lymphoma of the musculoskeletal system. Magn Resort Imaging Clin N Am, 2010, 18(1): 75-93.
  • 4Daniel A Jr, UUah E, Wahab S, et al. Relevance of MRI in prediction of malignancy of musculoskeletal system: a prospective evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2009, 10(10): 125.
  • 5Ginat DT, Mangla R, Yeaney G, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign from malignant skull lesions and correlation with cell density. AJRAm J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(6): 597-601.
  • 6Costa FM, Canella C, Gasparetto E. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors. Radiol Clin North Am, 2011,49(6): 1325-1358.
  • 7徐文坚,陈海松.重视骨关节系统MRI新技术的应用与研究[J].磁共振成像,2012,3(4):241-244. 被引量:6
  • 8陈应明,孟悛非,江波,赖英荣,马玲.骨肉瘤骨膜异常的影像表现与病理研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2008,42(3):247-252. 被引量:12
  • 9Bloem JL, Reidsma II. Bone and soft tissue tumors of hip and pelvis. EurJ Radiol, 2012, 81(12): 3793-3801.
  • 10Fayad LM, Mugera C, Soldatos T, et al. Technical innovation in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: an MR angiographic sequence using a sparse k-space sampling strategy. Skeletal Radiol, 2013, 42(7): 993-1000.

二级参考文献30

  • 1马玲,孟悛非,陈应明,江波.表观扩散系数值在原发性恶性骨肿瘤诊断中的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(11):1129-1134. 被引量:19
  • 2Erlemann R, Sciuk J, Bosse A, et aL Response of osteosarcoma and ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. Radiology, 1990,175 :791-796.
  • 3Bruce D, Ragsdale MD. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part Ⅱ: periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am, 1981, 19:749-783.
  • 4Edeiken J, Holds PJ, Caplan LH, et aL New bone production and periosteal reaction. AJR, 1966, 97:708-718.
  • 5Hayes CW, Conway MF, Sundaram M. Misleading aggressive MR imaging appearance of some benign musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics, 1992, 12:1119-1136.
  • 6Simon TM, Van-Sickle DC, Kunishima DH, et al. Cambium cell stimulation from surgical release of the periosteum. J Orthop Res, 2003, 21:470-480.
  • 7Reichert IL, Benjamin M, Gatehouse PD, et aL Magnetic resonance imaging of periosteum with ultrashort TE pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19: 99-107.
  • 8Whan A, Breidahl W, Janes G. MRI of trapped periosteum in a proximal tibial physeal injury of a pediatric patient. AJR, 2003, 181:1397-1399.
  • 9Pettersson H, Gillespy T 3rd, Hamlin DJ, et aL Primary musculoskeletul tumors: examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities. Radiology, 1987, 164 : 237-241.
  • 10Kim HS, Jee WH, Ryu KN, et al. MRI of chondromyxoid fibroma. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52: 875-80.

共引文献16

同被引文献153

引证文献19

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部