摘要
已有研究者指出《天主实义》对《孟子字义疏证》之影响,但侧重史学的学理依据,而缺乏哲学的学理依据。从哲学上看,《孟子字义疏证》从方法到原理,都有《天主实义》间接和直接影响的痕迹。但《天主实义》对《孟子字义疏证》的影响并非根本性质的。《孟子字义疏证》的思想仍处在新儒家语境内,与《天主实义》的神哲学实有本质区别。这是戴震虽受了《天主实义》的影响但却讳言其影响的学理原因。
Researchers have pointed out the influence of The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven on The Commentary on the Meanings of Terms in the Book of Mencius ( Meng Zi Ziyi Shuzheng), but they laid special stress on the basis of historiography and were short of the basis of philosophy. Philosophically , Meng Zi Ziyi Shuzheng had the trace of direct or indirect influence of The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven from its method to its principle. But the influence is not essentially different from the theological philosophy in The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven. This is a philosophical reason why DAI Zhen had been influenced by The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven, yet he didn't utter a single word about it.
出处
《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第4期15-22,共8页
Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）
关键词
戴震
《天主实义》
《孟子字义疏证》
人性说
哲学
考据学
DAI Zhen, The True Meaning of the lord of Heaven, The Commentary on the Meanings of Terms in the Book of Mencius
