期刊文献+

激惹、抑郁和焦虑量表(IDA)的信度和效度研究 被引量:79

The reliability and validity of irritability,depression and anxiety scale.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价IDA量表的信度和效度。方法 使用IDA、SDS和SAS对 2 91例大学生和 6 4例抑郁症患者进行评定。结果 IDA具有良好的心理测量特性 ,Cronbachα系数在 0 .419~ 0 .76 9,IDA各分量表的劈半相关系数在 0 .42 7~ 0 .6 39,IDA各分量表与SDS、SAS间的相关系数均在 0 .40 0~ 0 .776 ,IDA各分量表得分在非抑郁大学生、抑郁大学生和抑郁症患者之间存在非常显著性差异。结论 IDA量表具有良好的信度和效度 ,值得推广使用。 Objective To assess the reliability and validity of irritability,depression and anxiety scale(IDA).Methods A total of 291 undergraduates and depressive patients were tested by IDA,SDS and SAS.Results The IDA attained good psychometric properties:Cronbach α of IDA was ranged from 0.419 to 0.769;spit-half correlations ranged from 0.427 to 0.639;correlation coefficients between all subscales of IDA and SDS,SAS ranged from 0.400 to 0.776.There were significant difference among non-depressed undergraduates, depressed undergraduates and depressive patients.Conclusion The present study provided empirical support for the reliability and validity of IDA.It is worthy to be applied for clinical researches.
出处 《四川精神卫生》 2002年第1期11-13,共3页 Sichuan Mental Health
关键词 信度 效度 激惹 抑郁 焦虑 大学生 Reliability Validity Irritability Depression Anxiety Undergraduates
  • 相关文献

同被引文献786

引证文献79

二级引证文献740

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部