期刊文献+

基于用户视角的健康信息服务平台质量评价研究 被引量:7

Quality evaluation of health information service platform based on user perspective
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探索在互联网情境下影响健康信息平台服务质量的关键动因,为国内健康信息平台的质量优化、用户的体验提升提供借鉴和参考。方法采用问卷调查法搜集到373份数据,结合结构方程模型方法验证假设和概念模型。结果研究发现,对健康信息服务平台质量有直接作用的有感知有用性(β=0.359, P<0.05)、感知易用性(β=0.144, P<0.05)、感知交互性(β=0.162, P<0.05)和影响力(β=0.280, P<0.05);其中,信息质量影响感知有用性,可获得性影响感知有用性和感知交互性,网站结构影响感知有用性、感知易用性和感知交互性,以及网站服务影响感知有用性、感知易用性、感知交互性和影响力。结论提升平台的信息质量、可获得性、网站结构以及网站服务质量,能有效提升健康信息服务平台的质量。 Objective To explore the critical factors that affect the quality of health information platform in Internet context, and provide reference for the quality optimization of domestic health information platform and user experience improvement. Methods A questionnaire survey was used to collect 373 data and structural equation modeling was use to validate hypotheses and the conceptual model. Results The study found that there was direct effect on the quality of health information service platform: perceived usefulness (β = 0. 359, P < 0. 05), perceived ease of use (β = 0. 144, P < 0. 05), perceived interactivity (β =0. 152, P <0. 05) and website influence (β =0. 280, P <0.05). Among 4 factors, information quality affected perceived usefulness, information availability affected perceived usefulness and perceived interactivity, website design affected perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived interactivity, and web services affected perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived interactivity and website influence. Conclusion Improving the information quality, availability, website structure and website services of the upgrade platform can effectively improve the quality of the health information service platform.
作者 胡媛 虞佳玲 艾文华 HU Yuan;YU Jia-ling;AI Wen-hua(School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)
出处 《中国健康教育》 北大核心 2018年第10期912-915,928,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Education
基金 江西省自然科学基金项目:数字图书馆社区知识聚合与推送服务研究(20161BAB211008)
关键词 健康信息服务平台 服务质量 用户体验 实证研究 Health information service platform Service quality User experience Empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献78

  • 1曾五一,黄炳艺.调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):11-15. 被引量:381
  • 2张晗,郭文,崔雷.链接分析法评价医学网络资源的可靠性研究[J].医学情报工作,2005,26(6):427-430. 被引量:7
  • 3侯立宏,朱庆华.网络信息资源评价方法研究综述[J].情报学报,2006,25(5):523-530. 被引量:22
  • 4美国CDC网站运营绩效介绍[EB/OL].[2010-04-02 ]. http ://www. cdc. gov/Other/pdf/CDCFactSheet, pdf.
  • 5张玢.中文互联网医学信息资源评价的研究[M],北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2003,
  • 6HON-CODE [EB/OL] . [2012-10-12] .http: // www. hon. ch/HONcode/Patients/Conduct_ cn. html.
  • 7Gattoni Filippo, Sicola Chiara, et al. How to Evaluate the Quality of Health Related Websites [ J/OL ] . Radiol Med, 2005, (109) : 280-287. http: //www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov! pubmed/15775897.
  • 8Berland G, Elliott M, Morales L, et al. Health Information on the Intemet : accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish [J . J Am Med Assoe, 2001, 285 (20) : 2612 -2621.
  • 9Childs S . Developing Health Web Site Quality Assessment Guidelines for the Voluntary Sector: outcomes from the judge project [J] . Health Information Library, 2004, (21) : 14 - 26.
  • 10Chang Fang - Fang, Ku Chia - Hua, Wang Kung - Jeng, et al. Quality and Usability Assessment for Health Information Websites: can commonly used evaluation criteria be appro- priately applied to assess Chinese - language websites? [ C ]. Communications in Computer and Information Sci- ence, 2011, (174): 391 -394.

共引文献113

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部