期刊文献+

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死20例分析 被引量:2

Clinical effect of intravenous infusion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 (rt PA)静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死 (AMI)的疗效及安全性。方法 :选择 2 0例AMI患者应用rt PA静脉溶栓治疗 ,观察临床症状、心电图、心肌酶谱的变化 ,判断冠状动脉再通率。结果 :① 2 0例AMI患者 ,冠状动脉再通 12例 ,再通率 6 0 %,其中发病 6h以内溶栓再通率 87.5 %(7/ 8) ,发病 6~ 2 4h溶栓再通率 4 1.7%(5 / 12 ) ,两者相比差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5 )。②≤ 6 5岁患者的血管再通率与不良反应发生率与 >6 5岁组相比差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :rt PA静脉溶栓治疗AMI是一种安全、有效的方法 ,宜提倡急诊室溶栓。 >6 5岁患者行静脉溶栓治疗是安全可行的 ,但要根据患者的具体情况而定。 Objective:To observe the therapeutic effect and safety of brief-duration intravenous infusion of rt-PA in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Method:Twenty patients with AMI were treated by brief-duration intravenous infusion of rt-PA, the reperfusion rate was evaluated by improvements of clinical symptoms, ECG and myocardium enzyme.Result:① Of the 20 patients, the reperfusion rate was 60%. The reperfusion rate of the patients who received thrombolysis less than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms was much higher than that of between 6~24 hours [ 87.5% (7/8) vs 41.7% (5/12), P< 0.05]. ② There were also no significant differences of side effect between≤65 years group and >65 years group (P> 0.05). The rate of reperfusion arrhythmia was 60%.Conclusion:Brief-duration intravenous infusion of rt-PA in patients with AMI is safe and effective and can be used in the emergency room. It is safe to administer intravenous infusion of rt-PA to patients who are over 65 years old, but their general conditions should be considered carefully.
作者 李本祥
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第3期115-116,共2页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 急性心肌梗死 血栓溶解治疗 重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 静脉溶栓治疗 Myocardial infarction Thrombolytic therapy Recombinant tissue-type plasmlnogen activator
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献1393

同被引文献15

  • 1廖晓星.急性心肌梗死再灌流治疗方法的最佳选择[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(8):621-623. 被引量:6
  • 2White HD. Single - bolus tenecteplase compared with font - loaded al- teplase in acute myocardial infarction The AssENT - 2double - blind randomized trial Assessment of the safety and efficacy of a new thrombolytic investigators Lancet . 1999 ( 354 ) :716 - 722.
  • 3Baigent C, Collins R, Rppleby P, et al. the ISIS- 2Collaborative Group : ISIS - 2 : 10 - year Servival among patients with Suspected acute acute myocardial infarction in randomized Comparison of intra- venous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, orneither. BMJ. 1998,316 : 1337 - 1343.
  • 4Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, et al. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction:a randomized study[ J]. lancet. 2002,360:825 - 829.
  • 5Sloan MA,Price TR,Terrin ML,et al.Ischemic cerebral infarction after rt-PA and heparin therapy for acute myocardial infarction:the TIMI-Ⅱ pilot and randomized clinical trial combined experience[J].Stroke,1997,28 (2):1107-1114.
  • 6Boersma E,Maas AC,Deckers JW,et al.Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction:reappraisal of the golden hour[J].Lancet,1996,348 (4):771-775.
  • 7Zeymer U,Tebbe U,Essen R,et al.Influnce of time to treatment on early infarct-related artery patency after different thrombolytic regimens[J].Am Heart J,1999,137 (6):34-38.
  • 8Boersma E,Mercado N,Poldermans D,et al.Acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,2003,361 (2):847-858.
  • 9De Luca G,Suuryapranata H,Zijlstra F,et al.For the ZWOLLE Myocardial Infarction Study Group.Symptom-Onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,42 (7):991-997.
  • 10De Luca G,Suryapranata H,Ottervanger JP,et al.Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary in angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:every minute of delay counts[J].Circulation,2004,109(8):1223-1225.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部