期刊文献+

腰椎间盘突出症的CT计量诊断探讨 被引量:15

A quantitative diagnosis of CT images of lumbar disc herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :寻找一种能精确表达 (或预测 )腰椎间盘突出症 (lumbardischerniation ,LDH)病理形态的CT计量诊断方法 ,用以指导临床治疗。方法 :回顾分析已通过手术确定了病理形态的 395例LDH患者 (45 2个间盘 ,A组 )的术前CT图像资料 ,将其CT图像特征分为 5个指标 14种表现 ,进行多因素判别分析并与术中所见比较 ;以多变量判别分析时各变量的赋值为基础制订计量诊断表。应用CT计量诊断表对后期手术治疗的 4 7例LDH患者 (B组 )进行前瞻性研究。结果 :LDH各病理类型之间的CT图像特征在统计学上有极显著性差异 (P <0 0 0 1) ;应用计量诊断表对A组患者的术前CT图像资料进行回代检验 ,判别正确率为 84 73% ,B组前瞻性研究的判别正确率为82 6 9%。结论 :CT计量诊断能比较准确地预测LDH的病理形态 。 Objective:To search for a quantitative diagnosis of CT images of LDH correspondent with its pathologic types in order to guide clinical treatment.Method:Three hundred and ninety five cases of LDH patients(452 discs,the A group) with preoperative CT were analysed retrospectively and compared with its pathologic types found during operation.Its CT images were divided into 14 findings belonging to 5 indexes on which multivariate analysis was made whereby a quantitative diagnosis table was formed.47 cases of B group which would undergo an operation were studied by this table prospectively.Result:All types of LDH have a striking difference mutually ( P <0 001);it is found that the right rate was 84 73% and 82 69% respectively according to retrospective test of A group and prospective test of B group.Conclusion:The quantitative diagnosis of CT can predict the types of LDH relative accurately and guide clinical treatment rightly.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 2002年第1期19-22,共4页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 病理分型 CT 计量诊断 LDH Pathologic type CT Quantitative diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1丁建国,周康荣.腰椎间盘病变的CT和脊髓造影检查以及与手术比较(附61例分析)[J].临床放射学杂志,1993,12(6):356-359. 被引量:21
  • 2孙钢,肖湘生,肖越勇,刘汝勤,孙振峰.经皮腰椎间盘切除术──疗效及相关因素分析[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(11):742-745. 被引量:53
  • 3[1]Fritsch EW,Heisel J,Rupp S.The failed back surgery syndrom reasons,intraoperative findings and long-term results:A report of 182 operative treatments.Spine[J],1996,21(5):626-633.
  • 4[2]Saal JA.Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].Spine,1996,21(24s):2s-9s.
  • 5[3]Herron LD,Turner JA,Novell LA,et al.Patient selection for lumbar discectomy with a revised objective rating system[J].Clin Orthop,1996,325:148-155.
  • 6[4]Hasenbring M,Mariefeld G,Kuhlendahl D,et al.Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients:A prospective investigation of biologic,psychologic and social predictors of therapy outcome[J].Spine,1994,19(24):2759-2765.
  • 7[5]Spengler DM,Ouellette EA,Batie E,et al.Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc[J].J Bone Joint Surg,1990,72A(2):230-237.
  • 8[6]Junge A,Dvorak J,Ahrens S.Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar disc surgery:A prospective clinical study resulting in recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcome[J].Spine,1995,20(4):460-468.
  • 9[7]Abramovitz LD,Neff SR.Lumbar disc surgery:results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorder of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons[J].Neurosurgery,1991,29(2):301-307.
  • 10[8]Dvorak J,Gouchat MH,Valach L.The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation:A 4~17 years,follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects[J].Spine,1988,13(12):1418-1422.

共引文献274

同被引文献80

引证文献15

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部