摘要
为凸现人的生存与人的本质的内在关系 ,本文从理论上比较研究了四种生存理论 ,即黑格尔的精神生存论、费尔巴哈的自然生存论、马克思的实践生存论、海德格尔的自我生存论 ,认为 :无论黑格尔所主张的理性自决的力量生成人的本质、费尔巴哈的感性生活自发生成人的本质 ,还是海德格尔的非理性的个人体验生成人的本质 ,都只能诠释出“单个人所固有的抽象物” ;只有马克思的实践生存理论才能将诸多生存视界整合起来 ,揭示出人的完整的实践本质 ,并由此入手 ,剖析了当代生存哲学研究陷入“准存在主义”误区的根本原因。
In order to manifest the internal relations between human existence and human nature, this article compares theoretically four thoughts on human existence. Hegel's theory of spiritual existence and feuerbach's theory of natural existence. Marxist theory of practical existence and Heidegger's self_existence theory. The author believes that all these theories, which includes Hegelian advocacy of the power of rational self_determination forming human nature, Feuerbach's perceptual life spontaneously forming human nature and Heidegger's theory of non_rational individual experience forming human nature, can only explain the individual property on its own part. While Marxist theory of practical existence unifies many of the existential ideas and discloses the integrated practical nature of human being. Based on Marxist theory this article also exposes the fundamental reason why the research of the contemporary existential philosophy falls into the false field of quasi_existentialism.
出处
《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》
2001年第6期43-48,共6页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）
关键词
精神生存论
自然生存论
自我生存论
实践生存论
人
生存哲学
本质
马克思
黑格尔
the theory of spiritual existence
the theory of natural existence
the self _existence theory
the theory of practical existence
quasi_existentialism
